Utilization and Costs of Patients With Type-2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Treated With Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Glucagon Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists
Speaker(s)
Shrikhande M1, Gressler L2, Peng C3, Johnson C3, Painter JT4
1University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, SanDiego, CA, USA, 2University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, AR, USA, 3University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, Little Rock, AR, USA, 4University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
OBJECTIVES: Our study aims to evaluate and compare the annual healthcare utilization and costs among individuals with T2D and CVD treated with either Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) or Glucagon Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RA) as some medications from these classes have shown reduced cardiovascular risk in type-2 diabetes (T2D) patients with or at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using commercial claims data from 2015-2022. Index date and index medication were defined based on the first prescription initiated in the identification period (1st April 2016 to 31st December 2021) from either SGLT-2i or GLP-1 RA class. The cohort included patients with T2D, and CVD, aged 18 years and above, who were continuously enrolled in medical and pharmacy benefits 6 months before and 12 months after the index date. Patients were labeled as SGLT-2i or GLP-1 RA users based on index medication. Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline covariates. Patient outcomes were evaluated over a 12-month period post-index date. Healthcare utilization and costs were assessed using negative binomial regression and a generalized linear model in the inpatient, outpatient, emergency, and pharmacy settings.
RESULTS: IPTW successfully balanced baseline covariates. Pharmacy costs for SGLT-2i were significantly lower than GLP-1 RA (-0.32, CI: -0.37, -0.26, p<0.0001). All-cause healthcare costs were also significantly lower in SGLT-2i users than GLP-1 RA users (-0.23, CI: -0.28, -0.18, p<0.0001) in the follow-up period. No significant difference was observed with respect to all-cause healthcare utilization in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: All-cause healthcare costs were significantly lower for SGLT-2i users versus GLP-1 RA users among T2D patients with CVD. These findings can be used to educate patients to inform shared decision-making and help payers make decisions related to formulary coverage alongside clinical evidence.
Code
EE490
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders (including MI, Stroke, Circulatory), Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity)