A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Robotic-Assisted Surgery Using the Da Vinci Surgical Systems for Benign Gynecological Procedures to Laparoscopic or Open Approach
Speaker(s)
Mathur M1, Vaidya P2, Yankovsky A3, Kreaden U3
1Intuitive Surgical, Union City, CA, USA, 2O-Zone 2.0 HEOR Consultancy, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 3Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Robotic-assisted surgery use is increasing for benign gynecologic procedures. We reviewed the evidence across three benign procedures to understand the clinical value of robotic-assisted surgery and present the meta-analysis results.
METHODS: A PRISMA-guided literature review and a meta-analysis assessed studies where robotic-assisted surgery was compared to laparoscopic or open approach in benign hysterectomy (BH), myomectomy (MYO), and endometriosis resection (ER). A PubMed, Embase, and Scopus search spanning a 12 year period was performed. Studies were excluded if non-English language, pediatric cases, malignancies, absence of relevant outcomes, or redundant data. Key outcomes assessed included operative time, conversions, transfusions, hospital stay, postoperative complications, reoperations, and readmission within 30-days of surgery.
RESULTS: The search identified 30 publications on BH, 22 on MYO, and 9 on ER. Compared to laparoscopic surgery, patients undergoing robotic-assisted benign gynecologic surgery were 60% less likely to be converted (OR=0.40[0.23,0.71], p=0.002), were 13% less likely to experience a complication (OR=0.87[0.77,0.9951], p=0.04), and were 20% less likely to receive a transfusion (OR=0.80[0.70,0.93], p=0.003). There were no differences in hospital stay, readmissions or reoperations. Operative time was longer for robotic-assisted benign gynecologic surgery by 34 min. Compared to open surgery, patients undergoing robotic-assisted benign gynecologic surgery were 73% less likely to receive a transfusion (OR=0.27[0.15, 0.50], p<0.0001), were 53% less likely to experience a complication (OR=0.47[0.37, 0.59], p<0.0001), and had on average shorter length of stay by 1.5 days. There were no differences in operative time, readmissions, or reoperations.
CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis of available evidence demonstrates that using da Vinci surgical system for benign gynecologic surgery results in lower conversion rates, less transfusions, and less postoperative complications. This analysis represents a holistic approach to evaluating evidence within benign gynecologic procedures. These findings can help regulators and decision makers evaluate robotic-assisted surgery for benign gynecologic procedures.
Code
PT42
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Health Technology Assessment, Medical Technologies, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Decision & Deliberative Processes, Medical Devices, Meta-Analysis & Indirect Comparisons
Disease
Medical Devices, Surgery