Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvant Olaparib in Germline BRCA1/2-Mutated, High-Risk, Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2-Negative Early Breast Cancer: A Canadian Perspective
Speaker(s)
Parackal A1, Ting E2, Verhoek A3, Joy A4, Sehdev S5, Hettle R6
1AstraZeneca, Newmarket, ON, Canada, 2AstraZeneca Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 3Cytel, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 4University of Alberta and Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 5The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 6AstraZeneca, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: This evaluation examined the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant olaparib versus watch and wait (W&W) in patients with germline BRCA1/2 gene mutation (gBRCAm1/2), high-risk, human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer (eBC) previously treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, from a Canadian healthcare perspective.
METHODS: A five-state, semi-Markov state transition model was developed using a lifetime horizon. The target population was the intent-to-treat (‘overall’) population of the phase III randomized trial OlympiA (NCT02032823) which included patients with triple-negative (TNBC) and hormone receptor-positive (HR+) eBC. Health state transitions were modelled using data from OlympiA, supplemented with data from the OlympiAD (NCT02000622) phase III trial in gBRCAm1/2 advanced breast cancer and gBRCAm1/2-adjusted background mortality. Modelled costs included drug acquisition and administration, subsequent therapies, adverse events, hospitalization, and physician visits. Outcomes were measured in life years (LY), and quality-adjusted LYs (QALY) calculated using literature utility values. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 1.5% annually. To account for differences in future treatment and recurrence risk by HER2 status, total costs and outcomes were estimated separately for TNBC and HR+ and combined to calculate an overall population incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Probabilistic and deterministic analyses were performed.
RESULTS: In the probabilistic base case, olaparib was associated with an additional 2.03 LYs (24.49 vs. 22.46) and 1.63 QALYs (19.41 vs. 17.77) and an incremental cost of $67,970CAD versus W&W. The ICER for olaparib was $41,597CAD per QALY gained in the probabilistic analysis, and $45,370CAD in the deterministic analysis. The probability of olaparib being cost effective at $50,000CAD per QALY gained was 66.5%. Results were consistent across HER2 subgroup and scenario analyses. Modelled outcomes were validated against OlympiA and external data.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant olaparib is a cost-effective alternative to W&W in patients with gBRCAm1/2, high-risk, HER2-negative eBC, including those with TNBC and HR+, in Canada.
Code
EE317
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Genetic, Regenerative & Curative Therapies, Oncology