Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Medications in Non-Diabetic Obesity Population
Speaker(s)
Lin LY, Ghodke O, Yang Y
Department of Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Obesity is one of the most prevalent chronic conditions in the US. While lifestyle changes remain the primary approach, there's a growing use of GLP-1 receptor agonists to treat obesity. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of semaglutide plus lifestyle counseling versus liraglutide plus lifestyle counseling in non-diabetic adults with obesity.
METHODS: A Markov model was constructed from the payer’s perspective to model the average quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the costs of both treatments, with future costs and QALYs discounted by 3.0% annually. People enter the model at age 49.13 with an initial BMI of 37.1, of whom 50% were female. People move between three states, lose weight, treatment discontinuation, and death, on a monthly cycle. Data were mainly derived from STEP 8 clinical trial. Costs were obtained from Red Book 2023. The model examined a period of 5 years to capture the long-term influence of GLP-1 medication on weight loss. The main outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A strategy was considered cost-effective if the ICER was less than the willingness-to-pay threshold ($100,000 per QALY gained).
RESULTS: At 5 years, semaglutide plus lifestyle counselling was the preferred strategy, with an ICER of $1.2 million per QALY gained vs liraglutide plus lifestyle counselling. However, $1.2 million per QALY gained is greater than the willingness-to-pay threshold. Model results were most sensitive to the cost of medications and the rate of severe adverse events for both arms.
CONCLUSIONS: The result indicates that, after 5 years, semaglutide plus lifestyle counseling will be cost-effective compared to liraglutide plus lifestyle counseling for non-diabetic adults with obesity. However, the ICER value was over the willingness-to-pay threshold. This study did not consider other health benefits related to weight loss, so the QALY gained from both interventions might be underestimated.
Code
EE264
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity), No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas