Cost-Utility Analysis of Add-on Stiripentol Vs Cannabidiol and Vs Fenfluramine in Dravet Syndrome in the USA
Speaker(s)
Weston G1, Yi Y1, Alexander D1, Serraz B2, Schad C3, Fourcroy MML2, Marre C2
1Adelphi Values PROVE, Bollington, Cheshire, UK, 2Biocodex Orphan Disease Division (HQ), Gentilly, France, 3Biocodex US, Bedminster, NJ, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Dravet syndrome (DS) is a rare, life-threatening developmental epileptic encephalopathy. Patients are often refractory to background anti-seizure medications (ASMs) and require ‘add-on’ therapy to improve seizures control. This study assessed the cost-utility of initiating stiripentol versus other licensed add-on therapies (cannabidiol, fenfluramine) or continued background ASM therapy in DS patients from age 2 years.
METHODS: A Markov model was developed with a three-monthly cycle and six health states: “Seizure Free” (100% reduction from baseline in monthly convulsive seizures frequency); “Profound Seizures Reduction” (75-<100%); “Clinically Meaningful Reduction” (50-<75%); “Not Adequately Controlled” (<50% reduction); “Maintenance Therapy” (following treatment discontinuation); and “Death”. Efficacy data were derived from an indirect treatment comparison of RCT data. DS-specific utility values and resource use were obtained from the literature. Drug costs were based on real-world dosing. Base case analyses adopted a 15-year time horizon and a US healthcare payer perspective in 2023. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review willingness-to-pay threshold of $200,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was used as a cost effectiveness benchmark.
RESULTS: Stiripentol generated the most QALYs of all therapies and had an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $103,923/QALY against cannabidiol and $89,110/QALY against continued background ASMs. Stiripentol economically dominated fenfluramine, generating more QALYs (+0.13) and being less costly (-$119,645). In addition, stiripentol was economically preferred or had an ICER below $200,000/QALY in a wide range of sensitivity and scenario analyses, including: initiation at age 6 months or in adults; longer or shorter time horizons; use of maximum licensed dosing; and adoption of a societal perspective
CONCLUSIONS: At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $200,000/QALY, stiripentol is a cost-effective add-on therapy compared with cannabidiol or fenfluramine and background ASMs. In addition to its robust clinical evidence, these health economic data further support the utilization of stiripentol as a first-line add-on therapy for treatment of seizures in DS.
Code
EE270
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Meta-Analysis & Indirect Comparisons
Disease
Drugs, Neurological Disorders, Pediatrics, Rare & Orphan Diseases