Factors Associated with Biologic Treatment De-Escalation in Patients with Crohn’s Disease
Speaker(s)
Lien PW1, Lee TA2
1University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 2University of Illinois Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Long-term biologic treatment in Crohn’s disease (CD) can pose important economic and safety concerns. One treatment strategy that has been proposed is biologic de-escalation. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with biologic de-escalation among patients with CD in remission.
METHODS: We identified adult CD patients in remission (no/low-dose steroid use for ≥6 months) continuously treated with biologics for ≥8 months from the Merative Marketscan Research Databases during the period from 2010-2021. We identified individuals with a biologic treatment gap (>30 days) as those with therapy de-escalation. We compared those with de-escalation to individuals that continued treatment and identified factors associated with de-escalation using logistic regression.
RESULTS: In the cohort (n=12,606; mean age: 40 [SD: 16] years; female: 50%), 38% (4,827) were identified as having a period of de-escalation. Individuals in the de-escalation group had a median of one de-escalation period (IQR: 1-2) during the follow-up period. The median duration of the de-escalation period was 4.5 months (IQR: 3.0-12.2). When contrasting the de-escalation group with the continuous treatment group, predictors of de-escalation included renal disease (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.03-1.61), unspecified disease location vs. ilium colonic disease location (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.08-1.32), ilium disease location (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01-1.25), and prior CD-related emergency visits (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.04-1.30). Factors associated with being in the continuous treatment group were male gender (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.83-0.96), recent cohort entrance (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.49-0.57), and use of intravenous biologics (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.52-0.61). Other factors including prior CD-related hospitalizations, prior surgeries, stricture, fistula, and anemia were not significantly associated with either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Biologic de-escalation post remission was not uncommon in CD patients and factors beyond disease severity were associated with de-escalation. Future studies should investigate the real-world effectiveness of biologic de-escalation post remission on patient outcomes.
Code
CO117
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Epidemiology & Public Health, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment
Disease
Biologics & Biosimilars, Gastrointestinal Disorders