Assessment of Quality of Life in Type II Diabetic Patients
Speaker(s)
Rendek-Forró L1, Máté O2, Elmer D3, Kajos L4, Kovács B5, Boncz I5, Kívés Z6
1University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary, Hungary, 2University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary, 3University of Pécs, Pécs, PE, Hungary, 4University of Pécs, Pécs, BA, Hungary, 5University of Pécs, BUDAPEST, PE, Hungary, 6University of Pécs, PÉCS, BA, Hungary
OBJECTIVES: The research aims to assess the quality of life of patients with type II diabetes, the extent of depression and sleep disorders and the factors affecting them.
METHODS: The cross-sectional research was conducted in Hungary between 02.01.2023 and 02.28.2023, among patients with type 2 diabetes (n=230) selected using a simple nonrandom sampling method. The question groups of the online questionnaire are sociodemographic data, complications, health behaviour, blood sugar and HbA1C value. Validated questionnaires inlcuded the Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life, the Beck depression questionnaire, and the Groningen sleep quality scale. Descriptive statistical analysis, factor analysis, Mann-Whitney U-test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Spearman correlation analysis (p<0.05) were performed using SPSS 28.0 software.
RESULTS: HbA1C increased in 71.3% of the sample. The HbA1C value was significantly (p=0.008) higher for elementary school graduates (92.3%, 36 people) than for high school (88,5%) and university graduates (72.9%). 18.3% have moderate and 3.5% severe depression. Severe depression is more common among those living alone (37.2%; p=0.017) and those with primary education (37.2%; p=0.025). Deterioration of sleep quality occurs in the case of 92 people. We measured the worst values in the "freedom of needs" (-4.5) and "mobility" (-3.1) dimensions of the quality of life, and the best values in the interpersonal dimension (-1.6). Men had a significantly (p<0.001) worse average in the dimensions of mobility (-3.6), living conditions (-3.3) and freedom of needs (-5.2). People aged 50-60 scored significantly (p<0.001) worse than people over 61 in the mobility (-3.6), living conditions (-3.5), and self-confidence (-2.9) dimensions. Most quality of life dimensions showed worse values in mild and severe depression (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: During the care of diabetic patients, it is recommended to jointly and continuously examine depression, sleep quality, and diabetes-specific quality of life to monitor deviations and to provide adequate treatment as needed.
Code
PCR60
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient Behavior and Incentives, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Public Health
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity), Mental Health (including addition)