Progression-Free Survival after First-Line Treatment in Endometrial Cancer Patients: A Real-World Perspective from Brazil and Argentina
Speaker(s)
Abreu G1, Queiroz J2, Nogueira da Silva TL2, Soares C2, Menezes P2, Carrizo M3, Scibona P4, Simonovich VA4, Riggi MC4, Cravero F4, Bernardino G2, Pires T2, Luiz Alves Ribeiro de Souza A5, Jotimliansky L3
1GSK, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2GSK, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3GSK, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 4Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 5Orizon, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Endometrial Cancer Health Outcomes Study (ECHOS) is a real-world retrospective database study that evaluated treatment patterns and health outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). Progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EC who received first-line (1L) platinum-based treatment (PBT) was described.
METHODS: ECHOS used data from electronic medical charts from a private hospital in Argentina (2010–2019) and claims data from private insurance plans in Brazil (2015-2020). Index (proxy for diagnosis) was the first date of an EC-related health term/ICD-10 code or procedure/treatment. PFS was evaluated for patients who received 1L PBT and carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP). Cumulative risk of progression using Kaplan-Meier was presented for the first five years of follow-up.
RESULTS: 805 patients with EC in Argentina and 3139 in Brazil were identified. In Argentina, 198 were treated with systemic therapy (24.6%). Of these, 73.7% (n=146) received PBT in 1L; 72.6% was CP (n=106). In Brazil, 755 (24.1%) patients received systemic therapy, 68.9% (n=520) received PBT, and almost 80% (n=411) received CP. In Argentina, over 60% (n=93) of patients using PBT in 1L progressed to another treatment or died (radiotherapy 12.9%, surgery 9.7%, antineoplastic drug 58.1%, death 19.4%). In Brazil, progression occurred in 41.3% (n=215) of PBT patients in the 1L group. Most progressed to another antineoplastic drug (80.5%); 19.5% died. In Argentina, 1–5-year cumulative risks of progression after 1L PBT were 46.3%, 61.8%, 68.6%, 75.8% and 75.8%, and in Brazil, 36.2%, 52.1%, 57.1%, 57.1% and 59.8%. A Sensitivity analysis evaluating CP patients in 1L showed similar results to PBT patients.
CONCLUSIONS: High progression rates were observed for EC patients receiving 1L PBT; risk estimates suggest most progressions occurred within 2 years with a high utilization of subsequent systemic therapy. Treatment approaches preventing/delaying progression beyond what is achievable with PBT are needed.
Funding: GSK (221709)Code
RWD50
Topic
Real World Data & Information Systems
Topic Subcategory
Health & Insurance Records Systems
Disease
Drugs, Oncology