Benefit and Risk of Oral Anticoagulant Initiation Strategies in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer: A Target Trial Emulation Using the SEER-Medicare Database
Speaker(s)
Truong B1, Hornsby L2, Fox BI2, Chou C2, Zheng J3, Qian J2
1Auburn University, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Mettawa, IL, USA, 2Auburn University, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL, USA, 3Auburn University, College of Sciences and Mathematics, Auburn, AL, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation (AFib) having a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2. However, the benefits of OAC initiation at different levels of CHA2DS2-VASc in patients with AFib and cancer are unknown.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study by emulating a hypothetical target trial using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. We included cancer patients (breast, prostate, or lung), newly diagnosed with AFib between 2012 and 2019, with 12-month continuous enrollment before AFib diagnosis (n=39915), and excluded those with other indications for OACs, prior OAC use, recent stroke, major surgery, critical bleeding or severe renal diseases. We compared risks of stroke and bleeding were compared between five treatment strategies: (1) initiating OAC when CHA2DS2-VASc ≥1 (n=6008), (2) CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2 (n=8694), (3) CHA2DS2-VASc ≥4 (n=20286), (4) CHA2DS2-VASc ≥6 (n=30944), and (5) never initiating OAC (reference group, n=33907). Confounders (demographics, socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, cancer characteristics, and medication history) were adjusted using the cloning-censoring-weighting approach. Inverse probability weighted pooled logistic regressions were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CIs).
RESULTS: Only cancer patients who initiated OACs at CHA2DS2-VASc ≥6 had a lower risk of stroke (HR=0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.75) than never initiators. All four active treatment strategies had reduced risk of bleeding compared to non-initiators, with OAC initiation at CHA2DS2-VASc ≥6 being the most beneficial strategy (HR=0.49, 95% CI 0.44-0.55). In patients with lung cancer or regional/metastatic cancer, OAC initiation at any CHA2DS2-VASc level increased the risk of stroke and did not reduce the risk of bleeding (except for Regimen 4).
CONCLUSIONS: Among cancer patients with newly diagnosed AFib, OAC initiation at higher risk of stroke is more beneficial in preventing ischemic stroke and bleeding. Patients with advanced cancer or low life-expectancy may not need OAC therapy until higher CHADs-VASc scores.
Code
CO50
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Epidemiology & Public Health, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders (including MI, Stroke, Circulatory), Oncology