Analyses of Cancer Prevalence and Healthcare Costs for Metastatic and Non-Metastatic Cancers Among Employees Using Claims Data

Speaker(s)

Kansal AR1, Tafazzoli A2, Geng FF3
1GRAIL, LLC, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 2GRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA, 3KMK Consulting, Morristown, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Cancer diagnoses after metastasis represent a substantial fraction of the total costs of healthcare for employed individuals over the age of 50. This study seeks to explore the prevalence and relative costs of metastatic and non-metastatic cancers among employed individuals.

METHODS: A retrospective claims analysis was conducted using the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus dataset. The analyses focused on real-world healthcare costs of enrollees aged 50-64 with claims for either metastatic or non-metastatic cancers in 2022. Cancer claims were identified using ICD-10-CM codes based on either one inpatient or two outpatient claims. Metastatic cancers were identified using the presence of either a claim for a secondary cancer or cancers at two anatomic locations at initial diagnosis. To understand the impact of diagnosis after metastasis, the analysis compared paid amounts for individuals with metastatic versus non-metastatic cancers matched by cancer type, stratified by sex and 5-year age groups.

RESULTS: The prevalence of individuals being treated for metastatic and non-metastatic cancer increased with age from 0.69% and 1.28%, respectively, from ages 50 to 54 to 1.41% and 2.68% from ages 60 to 64. In the overall age range of 50-64, 34% of individuals with metastatic claims had costs exceeding $100k in a one-year period, while only 13% of those with non-metastatic claims exceeded the same threshold. Correspondingly, the average cost for each individual with a metastatic cancer claim was $90,336, while the average cost for non-metastatic claims, weighted to the same cancer type distribution, was $30,051. Accounting for prevalence of metastatic cancer, spending on metastatic versus non-metastatic cancer of the same type represented a potential difference of $625 per enrollee between ages 50 and 64.

CONCLUSIONS: Spending on cancer care among employees 50 to 64 years of age may be substantially reduced if cancers currently diagnosed after metastasis could be found when non-metastatic.

Code

EE122

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology