Chimerism Testing for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Cost-Utility Analysis
Speaker(s)
Tran J1, Kanaan S2, Canestaro W3, Hansen R1
1University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA, 3Washington Research Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
OBJECTIVES: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face elevated relapse and mortality risk following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but early identification of high-risk patients provides the opportunity for preventative interventions. Routine post-transplant monitoring with multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is recommended to detect measurable residual disease, a strong indicator of relapse risk, and more sensitive tests for mixed chimerism may supplement MFC. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of post-transplant monitoring with a novel chimerism assay panel in parallel with MFC for the identification of AML patients with high relapse risk compared to standard MFC alone.
METHODS: A Markov model was developed to project the health outcomes (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]), economic costs (in 2022 US dollars), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of parallel chimerism and MFC testing compared to MFC alone over 36 months. Each strategy was associated with unique test characteristics, and a proportion of identified high-risk patients were assumed to receive pre-emptive treatment to prevent relapse. We employed a healthcare payer perspective and discounted costs and outcomes at 3% per year. One-way, probabilistic, and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the range of potential outcomes considering the uncertainty in the current evidence.
RESULTS: At the assumed cost of $1,500 per chimerism test, parallel testing demonstrated modest clinical benefit with additional costs compared to standard MFC alone, but the ICER exceeded $1.65 million per QALY gained. The estimated value-based price for the chimerism assay was $1,030 per test, and the development of more effective preventative interventions would increase the value of chimerism testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Parallel chimerism and MFC testing would provide marginal benefits for post-transplant AML patients at increased costs and would not be cost-effective given current test characteristics and treatment options, but future advancements in pre-emptive therapies may increase the value of the chimerism assay panel in post-transplant monitoring.
Code
EE144
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation, Diagnostics & Imaging
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology