Advanced Prostate Cancer Decision Support through C PREFS (CANCER PREFERENCE REFLECTION AND ELICITATION FOR FAMILY SUPPORT)
Speaker(s)
Thayer W1, Mohandoss G2, Lewis J3, Chepkorir J3, Aziz A2, Jones RA4, Winch P2, Wenzel J3
1Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, East Wallingford, VT, USA, 2Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA, 3Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA, 4University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer patients who have metastatic disease face a terminal diagnosis, often with multiple palliative treatments available. Ensuring treatment decisions reflect patient preferences can be complicated by factors such as declining patient capacity, which can lead to increased reliance on proxy decision makers. Proxy decision makers in this position have been shown to experience negative outcomes, such as stress, anxiety, and depression. A quantitative measure of the patients’ preferences may be useful to create support interventions for patients and families and for future research to inform policymakers and clinicians. We set out to construct a discrete choice experiment to measure patient preferences for palliative anti-cancer treatment with the eventual goal of testing the instrument's usefulness in a clinical setting.
METHODS: We are conducting semi-structured interviews and a Q sort activity with metastatic prostate cancer patients and supporters. African American patients were intentionally oversampled to support representation of a group impacted by cancer disparities. Important attributes of palliative anti-cancer treatment decisions and trade-offs that patients and their supporters make were identified and ranked using qualitative descriptive and quantitative analyses.
RESULTS: Preliminary results reveal patients and supporters identify their choice of institution and provider as among the most important attributes of their treatment decisions. In addition, participants identified the importance of the effect of treatment on longevity, emotional effects of metastatic prostate cancer treatment, logistics of availing treatment, pecuniary considerations such as insurance coverage and potential medical debt, and having an active strategy to manage their cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: These results provide context for the development of a discrete choice experiment that is intended to support the cancer decision making process for patients and their proxy decision makers.
Code
RWD32
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology