Patient and Caregiver Perspectives Regarding Once-Weekly Injection Devices in Growth Hormone Deficiency: Qualitative Interviews To Inform a Patient Preference Study
Speaker(s)
Chen JV1, Yuen KCJ2, Kelepouris N3, Shah S4, Sharp R5, Jamal H5, Miller BS6
1Genesis Research Group, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2Department of Neuroendocrinology, Barrow Pituitary Center, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 3Novo Nordisk Inc, Plainsboro, NJ, USA, 4Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA, 5Adelphi Values Patient-Centered Outcomes, UK, Bollington, Cheshire, UK, 6Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, M Health Fairview Masonic Children's Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a rare disease estimated to affect approximately 1 in 3,500 to 10,000 children. Treatments typically include once-daily injections; however, the treatment landscape may be changing with the introduction of once-weekly long-acting growth hormone analogs (LA-GHAs). This study explored the perspectives of patients with GHD and their caregivers (CGs) regarding LA-GHA injection devices to inform the development of a quantitative patient preference survey.
METHODS: A draft attributes and levels (A&L) grid was developed following a targeted literature review of available clinical literature, product labels, peer-reviewed patient-focused literature, and other publicly available information. Twenty participants based in the USA were interviewed: adults with GHD aged ≥18 years (n=6); adolescents with GHD (aged 12–17 years) with a CG (n=8); and CGs (n=6) of children with GHD (aged <12 years). Qualitative interviews used an in-depth, think-aloud, cognitive debriefing approach to assess content validity of the A&L grid. The interviews examined the perceived importance of attributes, perceived impact on decision-making, and meaningfulness of level differences.
RESULTS: More than two-thirds of participants considered “injection device type”, “how to set the dose”, “preparation time”, “storage”, and “injection-site pain” to be important attributes that would impact GHD treatment decisions, expressing a preference for devices with simple preparation steps, minimal injection-site pain, and high room-temperature stability. The attributes “injection time” and “needle visibility” were considered less important and impactful relative to other attributes.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients and CGs value a once-weekly LA-GHA device that is convenient to use with minimal injection-site pain. Findings from this qualitative study and upcoming pilot interviews will inform a larger preference study that will quantify the relative importance of attributes corresponding to LA-GHA devices and explore the trade-offs that patients and CGs are willing to make.
Code
PCR29
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation, Patient Behavior and Incentives, Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Rare & Orphan Diseases