Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Medicare Beneficiaries Initiating Venetoclax Vs. Btkis for Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Real-World Study
Speaker(s)
Huntington S1, Manzoor B2, Jawaid D3, Puckett J4, Alhasani H3, Ravelo A5, Kamal-Bahl S6, Emechebe N3, Doshi JA7
1Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA, 2AbbVie Inc., CHICAGO, IL, USA, 3AbbVie Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, 4COVIA Health Solutions, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 5Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA, 6COVIA Health Solutions, Lansdale, PA, USA, 7University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: The availability of orally administered BTKis (e.g., ibrutinib, acalabrutinib) and recently fixed-duration BCL-2 inhibitors (i.e., venetoclax) have transformed treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, these novel drugs have not been compared in the real-world setting. This study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs in older adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL receiving venetoclax vs. BTKis.
METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study used 2015-2019 100% Medicare Part A/B/D claims, to identify beneficiaries age ≥66 years newly initiating venetoclax or BTKi for R/R CLL between 1/1/2016 and 12/31/2018. All-cause and CLL-related HRU and costs in the 12-months after treatment initiation were examined. Risk-adjusted outcomes controlling for differences in sociodemographic and clinical factors were estimated using logistic regressions (HRU) and generalized linear models (costs).
RESULTS: The final sample included 2277 patients (711 venetoclax group; 1566 BTKi group). Compared to the BTKi group, the venetoclax group tended to be younger (mean age 75.6 vs 77.6 years, p<0.001) but had poorer clinical characteristics (for example, 39.4% vs. 30.4% with ≥8 comorbidities [p<0.001]). Risk-adjusted rates of all-cause (63.7% vs. 50.9%) and CLL-related (60.2% vs. 43.9%) hospitalization were higher in the venetoclax vs. BTKi group (p<0.001 for all). Over 80% of all-cause costs were CLL-related for both groups. Risk-adjusted CLL-related medical costs were higher ($47,436 vs. $28,542, p<0.001) and CLL-related prescription costs were lower ($87,757 vs. $114,964, p<0.001) in the venetoclax vs. BTKi group, respectively. Overall, the venetoclax group had lower risk-adjusted CLL-related total costs compared to BTKi patients (-$8,313, p<0.001). Similar patterns were found for all-cause costs with total costs being lower in the venetoclax group (-$13,628, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study utilizing national Medicare data, older adults with R/R CLL initiating venetoclax had lower total all-cause and CLL-related costs than BTKi initiators during the 12-months following treatment initiation, largely driven by differences in prescription costs.
Code
EE158
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Drugs