Program

In-person AND virtual! – We are pioneering a new conference format that will connect in-person and virtual audiences to create a unique experience. Matching the innovation that comes through our members’ work, ISPOR is pushing the boundaries of innovation to design an event that works in today’s quickly changing environment. 

In-person registration included the full virtual experience, and virtual-only attendees will be able to tune into live in-person sessions and/or watch captured in-person sessions on-demand in addition to having a variety of virtual-only sessions to attend.

Comparing the Food and Drug Administration National Drug Code Directory and Redbook to Identify Prescription Records

Speaker(s)

Kathe N1, Vivek V1, Agrawal N2, Aparasu RR3
1Complete HEOR Solutions (CHEORS), North Wales, PA, USA, 2Complete HEOR Solutions (CHEORS), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 3University of Houston, College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: The National Drug Code (NDC) Directory by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is a publicly available, and frequently used in pharmacoepidemiologic to identify prescription drug usage. The current study compared the FDA NDC Directory data and Micromedex Redbook® in identifying frequently prescribed medication records in nationally representative utilization data using the NDC generic name mapping tables.

METHODS: The study included the records from the 2017-2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component (MEPS-HC) prescribed medicine file. Records for the top 50 most prescribed medications were retained based on the generic name. Records with a missing NDC code were removed. The NDC to generic name mapping tables from FDA NDC directory and Micromedex Redbook® were separately implemented for the previously identified records. For each of the 50 most prescribed medications, the proportion of records identifiable using the FDA NDC directory and Micromedex Redbook® mapping table were tabulated.

RESULTS: The study identified an unweighted sample of 349,641 prescription records representing 3.56 billion annualized records nationally. Micromedex Redbook® based NDC to generic name mapping tables identified 99.88 prescription records, whereas the FDA NDC directory based mapping tables only identified 90.95% of the records. The performance of FDA NDC directory based mapping tables varied across different drugs and was lowest for human insulin (55.65%), followed by warfarin (56.43%), clonazepam (60.89%), norgestimate (65.82%), and levothyroxine (69.91%).

CONCLUSIONS: The coverage by the publicly available FDA NDC directory based mapping table for the 50 most frequently prescribed medications was variable and incomplete. Micromedex Redbook®, in contrast, provides complete coverage of the 50 most frequently prescribed medications. Researchers should carefully select drug knowledge base sources for pharmacoepidemiology research.

Code

RWD51

Topic

Real World Data & Information Systems, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Electronic Medical & Health Records, Health & Insurance Records Systems

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas