A Psychometric Evaluation of the RAND 36 Scale Among Japanese Adults With Insomnia in 2023

Speaker(s)

Gordon A1, Modi K2, Yang L3, Honomichl R3, Li V3, Gupta S4
1Cerner Enviza, an Oracle company, Washington, DC, USA, 2Cerner Enviza, an Oracle company, New York, NY, USA, 3Cerner Enviza, an Oracle company, White Plains, NY, USA, 4Cerner Enviza, an Oracle Company, Flemington, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 Questionnaire is a widely used health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. Few studies have evaluated the psychometric properties of the instrument in a disease-specific population. This study aimed to assess the validity of the RAND-36 as an HRQoL measure among Japanese participants of the National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) with insomnia, using classical test (CTT) and item-response theory (IRT) approaches.

METHODS: Adults (age 18 and up) with a self-reported physician diagnosis of insomnia from the 2023 Japan NHWS (n=2,084) were included in the analysis. Response frequencies of all items in the RAND-36 were used to check for a balanced response, and associations between items were assessed with Pearson correlation tests. To determine the internal reliability of the RAND-36, Cronbach’s alphas were computed globally and for the 8 subscales. Subscale homogeneity was tested with Mokken scaling analysis. Lastly, the unidimensionality of subscales was identified with automatic item selection procedure (AISP) at increasing homogeneity thresholds.

RESULTS: Among the sample, all responses were well represented in the data, and no negative associations between items were found after reverse-coding (all Pearson’s rho>0.0). The internal consistency reliability was acceptable, with Cronbach’s alphas greater than 0.7 for the global composite measure and all 8 subscales (α=0.724 - 0.937). The Mokken scaling homogeneity coefficients indicated strong homogeneity within the subscales (H = 0.502- 0.753). Tests for local independence did not indicate any violations of learning effects within the intra-subscale items. Analysis of monotonicity detected violations for the Energy/Fatigue and Emotional Well-being subscales.

CONCLUSIONS: A stepped psychometric analysis of the RAND-36 has provided evidence of the scale’s validity to measure HRQoL in an insomnia-burdened patient population. Additional IRT analyses will be conducted to further assess the validity of RAND-36 in this cohort.

Code

PCR120

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Mental Health (including addition), Neurological Disorders