Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC) of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Patients with Treatment-Naive Metastatic BRAF V600 Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Speaker(s)

Tai TA1, Perampaladas K2, Cooney P1, Mensah L2, Jameson K2, Rafia R2, Bains R2, Kane N2
1Novartis Global Service Centre, Dublin, Ireland, 2Novartis Pharmaceuticals, London, UK

OBJECTIVES: There is a large unmet need for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harbouring the BRAF V600 mutation. The efficacy of dabrafenib with trametinib (Taf-Mek) for the treatment naive metastatic BRAF V600 mutated NSCLC was assessed in the single arm phase II BRF113928 trial (NCT1033634). In the absence of a head-to-head study, an unanchored MAIC was conducted to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (Pembro+PDC).

METHODS: Individual patient data (IPD) from Cohort C of the BRF113928 trial (NCT01336634) were weighted to match the aggregate baseline characteristics of the Pembro+PDC arm from the KEYNOTE-189 trial (NCT02578680). The prognostic variables were selected based on literature and Cox-regression analysis, and included age, gender, ECOG, smoking status, histology, liver metastases, brain metastases and extent of metastasis. Pseudo IPD of Pembro+PDC was obtained by digitizing Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves and the Guyot algorithm. After matching, hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using a weighted Cox proportional hazard model. Success of matching was assessed by inspecting distributions of weights and effective sample size (ESS).

RESULTS: The MAIC successfully balanced reported baseline characteristics. Before matching, OS was similar between Taf-Mek and Pembro+PDC (HR 0.944 [95% CI 0.638 - 1.398]) while adjusted HR numerically favored Taf-Mek (HR 0.817 [95% CI 0.454 - 1.471]). Taf-Mek appeared to prolong PFS compared with Pembro+PDC both before and after matching but the difference was not significant (naive HR 0.759 [95% CI 0.493 - 1.167]; adjusted HR 0.842 [95% CI 0.295 - 2.402]).

CONCLUSIONS: The MAIC showed that Taf-Mek has numerically better OS and PFS than Pembro+PDC in treatment-naive metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive NSCLC patients; however results are not statistically significant. A limitation of this study is that it was not possible to match for BRAF mutation and PD-L1.

Code

PT35

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Oncology