Evaluation of Healthcare Resource Utilization and Cost Among First-Line Patients Receiving Ibrutinib Vs Acalabrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL): A Commercial Claims Database Analysis

Speaker(s)

Muluneh B1, He J2, Ding Z3, Bokun A3, Qureshi ZP3
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA, 3Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and cost in CLL/SLL patients who received first-line (1L) single-agent ibrutinib or acalabrutinib.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included CLL/SLL patients from a US commercial claims database. The index date was the date of initiating single-agent ibrutinib or acalabrutinib as 1L between 21NOV2019 and 30SEP2022. The other key selection criteria were: (1) ≥6 months continuous enrollment before index; (2) no other malignancies before index; (3) no other CLL/SLL treatment before or within the first 28 days after index. CLL/SLL-related HRU and cost (based on the first diagnosis field in claims) during the follow-up period were reported per patient per month (PPPM) and compared after adjustment of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics using propensity score weighting.

RESULTS: A total of 537 and 355 patients were included in the ibrutinib and acalabrutinib cohorts, respectively. Their baseline characteristics were similar, with a mean age of 64 years, 66% males, and Quan Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.7 for both cohorts. Compared to the acalabrutinib cohort, the ibrutinib cohort had significantly lower PPPM CLL/SLL-related physician office visits (0.57 vs. 0.76) and outpatient visits (0.80 vs. 1.07) during the entire follow-up period. The adjusted rate ratio (aRR) after propensity score weighting was 0.83 (P<0.05) and 0.82 (P<0.01), respectively. Similar findings were obtained during the 1L period, which was 0.62 vs.0.83, aRR=0.81 (P<0.01) for physician office visits, and 0.86 vs. 1.09, aRR=0.85 (p<0.05) for outpatient visit. The ibrutinib cohort also had significantly lower mean PPPM CLL/SLL-related total costs than acalabrutinib during the entire follow-up period, which was $13,657 vs. $15,864. The adjusted mean difference was $956, (p<0.05) after propensity score weighting.

CONCLUSIONS: Use of single-agent ibrutinib in 1L CLL/SLL was associated with fewer CLL/SLL related physician office visit, outpatient visit, and total cost than 1L acalabrutinib.

Code

EE694

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Drugs, Oncology