Cost-Effectiveness of Vaccination Strategies to Control Future Mpox Outbreaks in England
Speaker(s)
Zhang XS1, Niyomsri S2, Mandal S1, Mohammed H1, Mindlin M1, Dugbazah B1, Turner C1, Florence I1, Amirthalingam G1, Ramsay M1, Charlett A1, Edney J1, Sugars E1, Kliner M1, Mannes T1, Jewitt E1, Gilbert L1, Moazam S1, Vickerman P3, Walker J3
1UK Health Security Agency, London, UK, 2University of Bristol, Bristol, BST, UK, 3University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To determine the most cost-effective vaccination strategy for reducing future outbreaks of mpox among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in the UK, following the 2022 outbreak.
METHODS: A validated deterministic compartmental model of mpox transmission and vaccination was used to project costs and outcomes in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (ICER) over a 10-year period, discounted at 3.5% and a £30,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. The model was parameterized using data from the 2022 outbreak and a GBMSM survey undertaken in December 2021 (RiiSH-MPOX). Different vaccination strategies were compared to no vaccination. Vaccine protection was assumed to last 1 or 3 years and have effectiveness of 78% and 89% for 1 and 2 doses. Cost inputs for vaccination, outbreak response, and case management were obtained from UKHSA, NHS standard costs or mpox-specific tariffs. Societal costs (absenteeism and presenteeism) for people with mpox were estimated using RiiSH-MPOX. QALYs were adapted from the Global Burden of Disease study.
RESULTS: The average total cost per mpox case was £2,772, driven by productivity losses (£1,601), followed by case-management (£755) and public health costs (£416). All vaccination strategies were cost-saving compared to no vaccination, irrespective of whether vaccination was only done during outbreaks (reactive) or pre-emptively irrespective of outbreaks. For a short duration vaccine (1-year protection), reactive vaccination was the most cost-saving strategy, resulting in savings of £75.07 million and 17.59 QALYs. However, if the vaccine provided 3-years protection, then pre-emptive vaccination was more cost-saving, saving £9.42 million and 11.18 QALYs. Sensitivity analyses supported vaccination if the vaccine cost was <£500.
CONCLUSIONS: Vaccinating against mpox is superior to no vaccination. Reactive vaccination is preferred if duration of protection is short; pre-emptive if longer duration. Analyses without productivity losses will be done as this is required to inform UK vaccine policy.
Code
EE746
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Vaccines