Evaluation of Resource Use and Costs of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab Formulations in HER2- Positive Breast Cancer

Speaker(s)

Meirelles I1, Nogueira Bezerra G2, Monteiro I3, Martins T4
1IQVIA Real World Insights, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, Boston, USA, 3Roche Farmacêutica Química, Lda, LISBOA, Portugal, 4Roche Farmacêutica Química, Lda, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: To quantify healthcare professionals (HCPs) time and costs associated with pertuzumab/trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC), pertuzumab plus trastuzumab double IV infusion and pertuzumab IV infusion plus trastuzumab SC administration in HER2-positive breast cancer patients treatment in the Brazilian health maintenance organization (HMO) perspective.

METHODS: Four HMO’s experts - an oncologist, a nurse, a pharmacist and a hospital manager - were interviewed to collect data on resources used, costs of consumables and time associated with HCPs tasks. For each alternative, costs of infusion or injection time, observation time and catheter implantation were considered. Drug costs were extracted from the Brazilian ceiling price list for medicinal products (CMED list 2022) and procedures costs from the standard list of procedures covered by HMOs (CBHPM 2020). Consumables costs and daily fees were obtained directly from the HMO. Observation time cost was calculated by multiplying the value/minute spent by HCPs by the corresponding average time spent.

RESULTS: In 1 year treatment (18 cycles), PH FDC SC use saves, on average, 24 and 15 hours per patient versus double IV infusion and pertuzumab IV plus trastuzumab SC, respectively. Time saved with PH FDC SC would allow to treat 5 or 3 patients extra versus double IV infusion or pertuzumab IV plus trastuzumab SC, respectively. Reduction in patient chair time, HCP fees and no need for a catheter implant translates into potential cost savings of up to R$ 18.774 versus double IV infusion and R$ 15.950 versus pertuzumab IV plus trastuzumab SC administration.

CONCLUSIONS: PH FDC SC requires less chair and HCP times being associated with lower administration, observation and catheter implantation costs, resulting in potential cost savings for healthcare units. Thus, PH FDC SC formulation has the potential to improve efficiency by alleviating time constraints for patients and busy healthcare units.

Code

EE665

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Drugs, Oncology