Efficacy of Venetoclax+Obinutuzumab+Ibrutinib Compared to Alternative Therapeutic Options in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (Fit Population): A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Speaker(s)

Stożek-Tutro A1, Reczek M2, Kawalec P3
1Doctoral School of Medical and Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Crocow, MA, Poland, 2HTA Consulting, Kraków, Poland, 3Jagiellonian University Medical College Institute of Public Health, Kraków, Poland

OBJECTIVES: Venetoclax+obinutuzumab+ibrutinib (VEN+OBI+IBR) is a new anti-leukemic regimen for patients with treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia (TN CLL), superior to chemoimmunotherapy (FCR / BEND+RTX) based on the results of the CLL13 trial (GAIA). However, the relative efficacy and safety of VEN+OBI+IBR compared to other treatment options remain unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of VEN+OBI+IBR versus alternative targeted therapy regimens including IBR+RTX, IBR+VEN and VEN+OBI, in the patients with TN CLL suitable to receive fludarabine chemotherapy (fit population).

METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the most important medical databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE) and additional sources to identify randomized clinical trials for TN CLL (fit population) until May 2023 (PROSPERO: CRD42023393903). Data for the most similar and the longest available follow-up were used from identified studies to compare progression-free survival (PFS) in Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). The results of NMA were presented as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The probability of the best treatment option was also calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using R and WinBUGS.

RESULTS: Six studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the NMA. In the analysis considering the most similar follow-up PFS was comparable between VEN+OBI+IBR and other targeted therapy regimens (HR [95%CI] for VEN+OBI+IBR vs. IBR+RTX 1.00 [0.53, 1.89]; for VEN+OBI+IBR vs. IBR+VEN 0.95 [0.44, 2.08]; for VEN+OBI+IBR vs. VEN+OBI 0.74 [0.39, 1,42]). Similar results were obtained in the analysis for the longest follow-up available. In both analyses, VEN+OBI+IBR had the highest probability of being the best treatment option.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of NMA suggest that VEN+OBI+IBR has similar efficacy versus other targeted therapy regimens in terms of PFS in TN CLL (fit population). However, it has the highest probability of being the best treatment option.

Code

CO182

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Meta-Analysis & Indirect Comparisons

Disease

Drugs, Rare & Orphan Diseases