Program

In-person AND virtual! – We are pioneering a new conference format that will connect in-person and virtual audiences to create a unique experience. Matching the innovation that comes through our members’ work, ISPOR is pushing the boundaries of innovation to design an event that works in today’s quickly changing environment. 

In-person registration included the full virtual experience, and virtual-only attendees will be able to tune into live in-person sessions and/or watch captured in-person sessions on-demand in addition to having a variety of virtual-only sessions to attend.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Longitudinal Studies on Drug Treatments for Gaucher Disease: Focus on Hematological Parameters

Speaker(s)

Leonart LP1, Tonin F1, Silva MR1, Szpak R1, Lombardi NF1, Fachi MM1, Böger B1, Pedroso MLA2, Pontarolo R1
1Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, 2Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize the evidence from longitudinal studies regarding the hematological effects of drugs for Gaucher Disease (GD).

METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in Medline and Scopus (April 2021). Observational and interventional longitudinal studies, comparative or not, evaluating enzyme replacement therapies (ERTs) and substrate reduction therapies (SRTs) were included. Single mean meta-analyses were conducted using R. The outcomes were change in hemoglobin and platelets values compared to baseline.

RESULTS: The search retrieved 2,246 articles after duplicates removal. Following screening and eligibility assessment, 68 reports were included. Several meta-analyses were conducted for each drug: imiglucerase (6 months to 5 years), velaglucerase alfa (6 months to 7 years), taliglucerase alfa (6 months to 5 years), miglustat (6 months to 4 years), and eliglustat (6 months to 9 years). For the outcome change in hemoglobin values, the only drug that did not result in significantly improvement in naïve patients was miglustat (e.g. 2 years: -0.1 g/dL, 95%CI -0.9; 0.7). In experienced patients (patients who had the disease under control), all drugs maintained the baseline values. For the outcome change in platelet levels, apart from eliglustat, all the other drugs were evaluated in naïve patients and resulted in significantly improvement compared to baseline. In experienced patients, miglustat was the only drug to decrease platelet values (e.g. 2 years: -38.4 109/L, 95%CI -66.1; -10.8). Limitations include the low number of studies in some of the assessed time points and the non-comparative nature of the analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: long-term results showed that ERTs are effective as treatment in both naïve and experienced patients. Miglustat did not significantly improve hemoglobin values in naïve patients and resulted in the decrease of platelet levels in experienced patients. All this evidence should be interpreted considering its limitations and does not replace a well conducted randomized trial.

Code

CO138

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Literature Review & Synthesis, Meta-Analysis & Indirect Comparisons, Relating Intermediate to Long-term Outcomes

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Drugs, Rare and Orphan Diseases