Program
In-person AND virtual! – We are pioneering a new conference format that will connect in-person and virtual audiences to create a unique experience. Matching the innovation that comes through our members’ work, ISPOR is pushing the boundaries
of innovation to design an event that works in today’s quickly changing environment.
In-person registration included the full virtual experience, and virtual-only attendees will be able to tune into live in-person sessions and/or
watch captured in-person sessions on-demand in addition to having a variety of virtual-only sessions to attend.
Key Issues in Health Economic Analysis in Nice Highly Specialised Technology Appraisals
Speaker(s)
Mumford A1, Ringger D2, Lewis H2
1Initiate Consultancy, Northampton, UK, 2Initiate Consultancy, London, UNITED KINGDOM
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES
: To determine key themes and issues identified by Evidence Review Groups (ERG) and the NICE committee during the NICE Highly Specialised Technology (HST) Appraisal process. Also, to explore the relationship between issues that limit the ability of the NICE committee to approve a product, as well as looking at ways that companies mitigate uncertainty in their appraisals.METHODS
: All products that followed the NICE HST process (to December 2021) were identified and analysed. In addition, an analysis of committee papers and subsequent publications was carried out, along with a targeted literature review of associated publications.RESULTS
: Of the 16 products that have followed the NICE HST process, the most common major criticism (87.5% of products) from the Evidence Review Group was that resource utilisation estimates were inaccurate, or that the methodology used was not sufficiently robust. Other criticisms included utility modelling not being robust enough (68.75%), utility estimation by clinicians (56.25%), clinician estimates of efficacy (43.75%), model approaches not being sufficient for decision making (31.25%), and trial endpoint robustness (25%). This led to 93.75% of cases that resulted in a positive recommendation having managed access agreements and confidential discounts applied to them. Major criticisms of submissions tend to centre around the lack of a robust methodology for derivation of estimates (resource utilisation and utility values) from clinicians.CONCLUSIONS
: Given that products that qualify for a NICE HST process tend to be in a rare disease area, there is typically a paucity of data. This usually leads to manufacturers turning to clinicians to seek estimates – it is crucial here to have a recognised, robust methodological process to elicit and validate estimates. Further review of NICE publications suggests that Modified Delphi and vignette studies may be most appropriate if carried out in a robust and meaningful way; validation across multiple stakeholders adds extra validity.Code
HTA46
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision & Deliberative Processes, Literature Review & Synthesis
Disease
Genetic, Regenerative and Curative Therapies