Program
In-person AND virtual! – We are pioneering a new conference format that will connect in-person and virtual audiences to create a unique experience. Matching the innovation that comes through our members’ work, ISPOR is pushing the boundaries
of innovation to design an event that works in today’s quickly changing environment.
In-person registration included the full virtual experience, and virtual-only attendees will be able to tune into live in-person sessions and/or
watch captured in-person sessions on-demand in addition to having a variety of virtual-only sessions to attend.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Resmetirom: An Investigational Treatment for the Management of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
Speaker(s)
Javanbakht M1, Fishman J2, Moloney E1, Rydqvist P2, Ansaripour A3
1Optimax Access, Southampton, UK, 2Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 3Optimax Access, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands
OBJECTIVES:
Resmetirom is an oral, liver-directed, thyroid hormone receptor beta (THR-β) selective agonist in Phase III development for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with significant fibrosis (NASH). An economic evaluation was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of resmetirom in the US setting.METHODS:
A Markov model was developed consisting of two sub-models of NASH, with and without cardiovascular (CV) history. In each sub-model, patients transitioned among no-fibrosis (F0) and fibrosis (F1-F3) stages, compensated cirrhosis (or F4), decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, post-liver transplant, and death. Data from a published randomized clinical trial of resmetirom versus placebo were used to populate the model. The transition from the first to second sub-model was driven by the first occurrence of a nonfatal CV event in NASH patients, estimated based on pooled baseline patient characteristics. The model captured worsening and improvement in the patients’ fibrosis stages (F0-F3) based on changes in liver fat, as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Model outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), cirrhosis/F4 and liver transplant cases avoided, and costs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (DSA/PSA) were performed, with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY applied.RESULTS:
An incremental 1.392 QALYs were gained in the resmetirom arm, with an incremental cost of $107,705 compared to no-treatment. The incremental cost/QALY gained for resmetirom versus no-treatment was $77,348. The cirrhosis/F4 and liver transplant risks were reduced by 32.48% and 33.82%, leading to cost savings of $47,880 (-39.98%) and $32,372 (-40.50%) in the resmetirom arm, respectively. The most impactful input parameter was the proportion of patients achieving fibrosis improvement in both arms, according to DSA. The PSA showed that resmetirom was cost-effective, with a probability of 70%.CONCLUSIONS:
Model results showed that managing NASH with resmetirom would be cost-effective in the US; reducing or preventing end-stage liver events and associated costs.Code
EE313
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation
Disease
Drugs