Program

In-person AND virtual! – We are pioneering a new conference format that will connect in-person and virtual audiences to create a unique experience. Matching the innovation that comes through our members’ work, ISPOR is pushing the boundaries of innovation to design an event that works in today’s quickly changing environment. 

In-person registration included the full virtual experience, and virtual-only attendees will be able to tune into live in-person sessions and/or watch captured in-person sessions on-demand in addition to having a variety of virtual-only sessions to attend.

Social and Economic Impact of Adverse Events in Switching from Pentavalent Whole Cell Pertussis to Hexavalent Acellular Vaccine for All Infants in Brazil

Speaker(s)

Watanabe SF1, Boiron L2, Santoro J1, Araujo RR3
1Sanofi Pasteur, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France, 3Sanofi Genzyme, São Paulo, Brazil

Objectives: This study aims to demonstrate the costs related to Adverse Events Post Vaccination (AEPV) of diphtheria, tetanus, whole-cell pertussis [DTwP] / hepatitis B [HB]/ Haemophilus influenzae type b [Hib] plus inactivated polio vaccine [IPV], and oral polio vaccine [OPV] (current scenario) versus the introduction of a fully liquid, hexavalent, acellular diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis [DTaP]-IPV/HB/Hib vaccine (alternative scenario) in the Brazilian public, private and social perspectives.

Methods: An economic model based on a decision tree was developed to demonstrate costs related to AEPV and productivity loss in Brazil. The probabilities were extracted from a published systematic literature review, and the data are specific for each dose (D) (3 doses + booster). We considered the full birth cohort in 2020, 2.9Mi infants, and all costs parameters were extracted from public databases and published data in 2020. Regarding the social perspective, the productivity loss of caregivers was considered only at D3 and D4 due to the maternity leave period in Brazil. The time horizon was one year.

Results: Switching from the current scenario to the alternative may result in savings of 13.4 Mi BRL and 78.8 Mi BRL to the public and private markets, respectively. The main reduction was found to be related to medical appointments to manage the AEPV, with a decrease of almost 60%. Furthermore, a reduction of 13.2 Mi BRL in transportation costs, 0.9 Mi BR in out-of-pocket medications and 8.9 Mi BRL in the productivity loss at the social perspective was also indicated.

Conclusion: The alternative scenario may help to avoid significant costs related to AE management and result in savings in this aspect for health systems and social perspectives. In addition, this may optimize resource allocation in Brazil, simplify vaccination schedule and increase acceptance of acellular vaccines for patients, parents thanks to more favorable tolerability.

Code

EE389

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Relating Intermediate to Long-term Outcomes, Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs

Disease

Pediatrics