Program

In-person AND virtual! – We are pioneering a new conference format that will connect in-person and virtual audiences to create a unique experience. Matching the innovation that comes through our members’ work, ISPOR is pushing the boundaries of innovation to design an event that works in today’s quickly changing environment. 

In-person registration included the full virtual experience, and virtual-only attendees will be able to tune into live in-person sessions and/or watch captured in-person sessions on-demand in addition to having a variety of virtual-only sessions to attend.

Mapping of Hand Hygiene Habits of Nurses

Speaker(s)

Papp B1, Ferenczy M2, Szabó L1, Karácsony I2, Turcsán J1, Takács K1, Boncz I1, Pakai A3
1University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary, 2University of Pécs, Szombathely, Hungary, 3University of Pécs, Pécs, ZA, Hungary

Objectives: Healthcare associated infections are a major problem worldwide and a challenge for the healthcare system. Intensive care units may be at increased risk of nosocomial infections, therefore the aim of our study was to assess hand hygiene practices of nurses in intensive care units during a primary study and to assess the extent of change in a post-training follow-up study in order to improve the hand hygiene techniques.

Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted between July and September 2019 among nurses working in the Central Intensive Care Unit (CICU), the Pediatric Intensive Therapy Unit (PITU) of the Department of Infancy and Pediatrics (NICU) and the Perinatal Intensive Care Center (PIC) of a county hospital, selected on the basis of non-random convenience sampling. We excluded those who had not attended hand hygiene education and those with other health care qualifications (N=36). Structured observation was used to record areas of hands that were not properly disinfected. Descriptive and mathematical statistics (χ2 test, t-test) were used using MS Excel (p<0.05).

Results: Significantly fewer failures were documented in the PIC group after education (PIC: 17 vs. CICU: 53; p=0.003). There was no difference when analyzing the control test scores of the PIC and PITU groups (PIC: 17 vs. PITU: 26; p=0.11). For all three groups, fewer error scores were recorded when comparing primary and control test scores (PIC: 42 vs. 17; PITU: 61 vs. 26; CICU: 78 vs. 53), so the compliance rate was significantly higher after training (PIC: p=0.03; PITU: p=0.008; CICU: p=0.004).

Conclusions: Hand hygiene education was effective in the intensive care units, with the PIC group having a higher hand hygiene compliance rate compared to the CICU group.

Code

CO14

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Clinician Reported Outcomes, Surveys & Expert Panels

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas