-
A Questionnaire to Assess the Relevance and Credibility of Observational Studies to Inform Health Care Decision Making - Report 1
-
Questionnaire to Assess Relevance and Credibility of Modeling Studies for Informing Health Care Decision Making - Report 2
-
Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Research to Support Medical Product Labeling
-
Validation of Electronic Systems to Collect Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data - Recommendations for Clinical Trial Teams
-
Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments
-
Modeling Good Research Practices - Overview: Report 1
-
Conceptualizing a Model: Report 2
-
State-Transition Modeling: Report 3
-
Modeling Using Discrete Event Simulation: Report 4
-
Dynamic Transmission Modeling: Report 5
-
Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis: Report 6
-
Model Transparency and Validation: Report 7
-
Content Validity - Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation Part 1
-
Content Validity – Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation Part 2
-
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - A Checklist
-
Quantitative Risk–Benefit Methodologies for Assessing Drug Safety and Efficacy - Report of ISPOR Risk–Benefit Management Working Group
-
Use of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Instruments and Their Modification
-
Multinational Trials – Recommendations on the Translations Required, Approaches to Using the Same Language in Different Countries, and the Approaches to Support Pooling the Data
-
Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures
-
Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures
Questions?
For any questions about this report please contact us.