Growing Evidence Base on Condition-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Long COVID

Aug 1, 2025, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2024.12.011
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(25)02337-X/fulltext
Title : Growing Evidence Base on Condition-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Long COVID
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(25)02337-X&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2024.12.011
First page : 1300
Section Title : LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Open access? : No
Section Order : 1300

We read with interest the recently reported study by Ye et al on the development and validation of the long COVID (LC) symptoms and severity score (LCSSS). The authors rightly highlight the significant global challenges of LC on patients and healthcare systems alike. This study is therefore a welcome addition in the ongoing efforts to both capture the individual symptom burden and impact of LC, as well as in endeavors to develop effective therapeutic strategies and appropriate healthcare. However, there is a noticeable absence within this study of any reference to the extant and growing body of literature on LC-specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Other limitations include the reliance on a limited pool of participants in the validation process (namely, college students, a limitation acknowledged by the authors), the lack of external verification of either a SARS-CoV-2 infection or post-COVID syndrome clinical diagnosis (entirely self-reported), and lack of items on functional abilities and health-related quality of life in their instrument.

 

Categories :
  • Health State Utilities
  • Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation
  • Patient-Centered Research
  • Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
  • Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction
Tags :
Regions :
  • Global
ViH Article Tags :