Comparison of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S With Other Preference-Based Measures Among United States Informal Caregivers [Editor's Choice]

Jul 1, 2024, 00:00 AM
10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.003
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(24)00117-7/fulltext
Section Title : PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES
Section Order : 967
First Page : 967

Objectives

Several measures have been used or developed to capture the health and well-being of caregivers, including the EQ Health and Well-being (EQ-HWB) and its short form, EQ-HWB-S. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties and construct validity of the EQ-HWB/EQ-HWB-S in a US caregiver population.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 504 caregivers. Eligible participants were 18+ years old, provided unpaid care to a relative/friend aged 18+ in the past 6 months, and spent on average of at least 1 hour per week caregiving. Survey included the following measures: EQ-HWB, Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers-Carer, CarerQol, and EQ-5D-5L. Psychometric properties were assessed using response distributions, floor/ceiling effects, Spearman’s correlation for convergent validity, and effect sizes (ES) for known-group validity based on caregiving situations and intensity.

Results

The average age of caregivers was 49.2 (SD = 15.4), with 57.5% being female. More than half (54.4%) reported high caregiving intensity, and 68.3% lived with the care recipient. The EQ-HWB-S index showed a strong positive correlation with the EQ-5D-5L (r  = 0.72), Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (r  = 0.54), and CarerQol (r  = 0.54) indices. Notably, the EQ-HWB-S index showed the largest ES among measures in differentiating caregiving scenarios with a large ES for caregiver’s general health (d = 1.00) and small ES for caregiving intensity (d = 0.39).

Conclusions

Results support construct validity of EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S as measures for assessing health and well-being of adult informal caregivers in comparison with other validated instruments. Differing levels of known-group validity across anchors emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate measures for caregivers, depending on research question and/or intervention aims.

https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(24)00117-7&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.003
HEOR Topics :
Tags :
  • ASCOT-Carer
  • caregivers
  • CarerQol
  • EQ-HWB
  • EQ-HWB-S
Regions :