How Well Does the EQ-5D-Y-5L Describe Children With Intellectual Disability?: “There’s a Lot More to My Child Than That She Can’t Wash or Dress Herself.”

Feb 1, 2024, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2023.11.005
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(23)06196-X/fulltext
Title : How Well Does the EQ-5D-Y-5L Describe Children With Intellectual Disability?: “There’s a Lot More to My Child Than That She Can’t Wash or Dress Herself.”
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(23)06196-X&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2023.11.005
First page : 190
Section Title : PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES
Open access? : No
Section Order : 190

Objectives

The EQ-5D-5L is a generic health utility instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with self-report and proxy report versions for children (EQ-5D-Y-5L). Children with intellectual disability (ID) are a heterogeneous population whose impairments and comorbidities place them at risk of poor HRQoL. This study aimed to describe the content validity and suitability for children with ID of a proxy report version of the EQ-5D-Y-5L as seen by their caregivers.

Methods

A proxy report EQ-5D-Y-5L was administered to caregivers of children with ID. Using cognitive think-aloud interviewing, participants were encouraged to provide the reasoning for their choices, assess the questions’ relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness, and comment on the tool’s strengths and weaknesses. Qualitative content analysis used both directed (deductive) and conventional (inductive) methods.

Results

There were 28 interviews with 30 caregivers of children with ID (aged 8-22 years, 17 boys, with autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, and rare genetic disorders). The EQ-5D-Y-5L was considered clear, concise, and largely relevant, but insufficiently comprehensive for this population. Interviewees sought clarification of the definition of HRQoL, whether it included unchanging impairments (vs fluctuating health states), and what basis of comparison to use (child or peer). Many interviewees suggested inclusion of questions for other domains, including communication and social engagement, equipment and human supports required, and a wider range of mental health questions.

Conclusions

The study suggests that further work is required to ensure accurate responses to the EQ-5D-Y-5L from caregivers of children with ID and to describe these children adequately.

Categories :
  • Health State Utilities
  • Mental Health
  • Patient-Centered Research
  • Pediatrics
  • Specific Diseases & Conditions
  • Study Approaches
  • Surveys & Expert Panels
Tags :
  • child
  • cognitive interview
  • content validity
  • Disability
  • EQ-5D-5L
  • health and wellbeing
  • health-related quality of life
Regions :
  • Asia Pacific (including Oceania)
ViH Article Tags :