Frameworks for Health Technology Assessment at an Early Stage of Product Development: A Review and Roadmap to Guide Applications

Aug 1, 2023, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.009
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(23)00107-9/fulltext
Title : Frameworks for Health Technology Assessment at an Early Stage of Product Development: A Review and Roadmap to Guide Applications
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(23)00107-9&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.009
First page : 1258
Section Title : SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
Open access? : No
Section Order : 1258

Objectives

Early health technology assessment (eHTA) can be used to evaluate and optimize a medical product’s value proposition and to inform go/no-go decisions by using health economic modeling, literature scanning, and stakeholder preference studies at an early stage of development. eHTA frameworks offer high-level guidance on conducting this complex, iterative, and multidisciplinary process. The objective of this study was to review and summarize existing eHTA frameworks, understood as systematic approaches to guide early evidence generation and decision making.

Methods

Using a rapid review methodology, we identified all relevant studies published in English, French, and Spanish from PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase until February 2022. We only included frameworks relevant to the preclinical and early clinical (phase I) stages of medical product development.

Results

From 737 reviewed abstracts, 53 publications describing 46 frameworks were selected for inclusion and classified into categories based on their scope: (1) criteria frameworks, which provide an overview of eHTA; (2) process frameworks, which offer stepwise guidance for conducting eHTA, including preferred methods; and (3) methods frameworks, which provide detailed descriptions of specific eHTA methods. Most of the frameworks did not specify their target users or the specific stage of technology development.

Conclusions

Despite some variability and gaps found across existing frameworks, the structure provided by this review helps inform eHTA applications. Remaining challenges are the frameworks’ limited accessibility to users without a background in health economics, poor distinctions being made among early lifecycle stages and technology types, and the inconsistent terminology used to describe eHTA in different contexts.

Categories :
  • Approval & Labeling
  • Decision & Deliberative Processes
  • Health Policy & Regulatory
  • Health Technology Assessment
  • Literature Review & Synthesis
  • Study Approaches
  • Value Frameworks & Dossier Format
Tags :
  • early health technology assessment
  • framework
  • health technology
  • product development
Regions :
ViH Article Tags :