An Intersectional Approach to Quantifying the Impact of Geographic Remoteness and Health Disparities on Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy: Application to Australia [Editor's Choice]

Dec 1, 2023, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2023.08.013
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(23)03131-5/fulltext
Title : An Intersectional Approach to Quantifying the Impact of Geographic Remoteness and Health Disparities on Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy: Application to Australia [Editor's Choice]
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(23)03131-5&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2023.08.013
First page : 1763
Section Title : PREFERENCE-BASED ASSESSMENTS
Open access? : Yes
Section Order : 12

Objectives

An intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) is a novel method for exploring the interaction between sociodemographic characteristics that affect health outcomes. This study explores the interaction between geographic remoteness and socioeconomic status on health outcomes in Australia from an intersectional perspective.

Methods

Data from a cross-sectional survey were matched with data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. To explore the effect of health-related quality of life on life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) was estimated through applying utility values derived from the EQ-5D-5L to life table data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The effect of geographic remoteness on QALE was quantified using multivariable linear regression. An intersectional MAIHDA was performed to explore differences in mean QALE across strata formed by intersections of age, sex, and Socioeconomic Indexes for Areas score.

Results

Based on multivariable linear modeling, QALE declined significantly with increasing remoteness (inner regional, −1.0 years [undiscounted]; remote/very remote, −3.3 years [undiscounted]) (P P = .016). No intersectional interaction effects between strata on QALE were found in the MAIHDA.

Conclusions

QALE has considerable value as a metric for exploring disparities in health outcomes. Given that no intersectional interactions were identified, our findings support broad interventions that target the underlying social determinants of health appropriately reduce disparities versus interventions targeting intersectional interactions.

Categories :
  • Patient-Centered Research
  • Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
  • Study Approaches
  • Surveys & Expert Panels
Tags :
  • health disparities
  • intersectionality
  • quality-adjusted life expectancy
  • rural health
Regions :
  • Asia Pacific (including Oceania)
ViH Article Tags :