Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of 360 Disease-Modifying Treatment Escalation Sequences in Multiple Sclerosis [Editor's Choice]

Jun 1, 2022, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1363
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(21)03194-6/fulltext
Title : Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of 360 Disease-Modifying Treatment Escalation Sequences in Multiple Sclerosis [Editor's Choice]
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(21)03194-6&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1363
First page : 984
Section Title : ECONOMIC EVALUATION
Open access? : Yes
Section Order : 984

Objectives

The rapid expansion in treatment options for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) of the past decade requires clinical decision making on the sequential prescription of these treatments. Here, we compare 360 treatment escalation sequences for patients with RRMS in terms of health outcomes and societal costs in The Netherlands.

Methods

We use a microsimulation model with a societal perspective, developed in collaboration with MS neurologists, to estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 360 treatment sequences starting with first-line therapies in RRMS. This model integrated data on disease progression, disease-modifying treatment efficacy, clinical decision rules, age-dependent relapse rates, quality of life, healthcare, and societal costs.

Results

Costs and health outcomes were overlapping among different treatment escalation sequences. In our model for RRMS treatment, optimal lifetime health outcomes (20.24 ± 1.43 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs], 6.11 ± 0.30 relapses) were achieved with the sequence peginterferon-dimethyl fumarate-ocrelizumab-natalizumab-alemtuzumab. The most cost-effective sequence (peginterferon-glatiramer acetate-ocrelizumab-cladribine-alemtuzumab) yielded numerically worse health outcomes per patient (19.59 ± 1.43 QALYs, 6.64 ± 0.43 relapses), but resulted in €98 127 ± €19 134 less costs than the most effective treatment sequence.

Conclusions

Effectiveness estimates of treatments have overlapping confidence intervals but the treatment sequence that yields most QALYs is not the most cost-effective option, also when taking uncertainty into account. It is important that neurologists are aware of cost constraints and its relationship with prescription behavior, but treatment decisions should be individually tailored.

Categories :
  • Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
  • Decision Modeling & Simulation
  • Economic Evaluation
  • Gastrointestinal Disorders
  • Medical Devices
  • Medical Technologies
  • Study Approaches
Tags :
  • fully incremental analysis
  • net health benefit
  • Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
  • treatment ranking
  • treatment sequence
Regions :
  • Eastern and Central Europe
ViH Article Tags :