Mapping From Visual Acuity to EQ-5D, EQ-5D With Vision Bolt-On, and VFQ-UI in Patients With Macular Edema in the LEAVO Trial

Jul 1, 2020, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2020.03.008
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(20)30185-6/fulltext
Title : Mapping From Visual Acuity to EQ-5D, EQ-5D With Vision Bolt-On, and VFQ-UI in Patients With Macular Edema in the LEAVO Trial
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(20)30185-6&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2020.03.008
First page : 928
Section Title : PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES
Open access? : Yes
Section Order : 928

Objectives

Mappings to convert clinical measures to preference-based measures of health such as the EQ-5D-3L are sometimes required in cost-utility analyses. We developed mappings to convert best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) to the EQ-5D-3L, the EQ-5D-3L with a vision bolt-on (EQ-5D V), and the Visual Functioning Questionnaire-Utility Index (VFQ-UI) in patients with macular edema caused by central retinal vein occlusion.

Methods

We used data from Lucentis, Eylea, Avastin in vein occlusion (LEAVO), which is a phase-3 randomized controlled trial comparing ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab in 463 patients with observations at 6 time points. We estimated adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models consisting of 1 to 4 distributions (components) using BCVA in each eye, age, and sex to predict utility within the components and BCVA as a determinant of component membership. We compared model fit using mean error, mean absolute error, root mean square error, Akaike information criteria, Bayesian information criteria, and visual inspection of mean predicted and observed utilities and cumulative distribution functions.

Results

Mean utility scores were 0.82 for the EQ-5D-3L, 0.79 for the EQ-5D V, and 0.88 for the VFQ-UI. The best-fitting models for the EQ-5D and EQ-5D V had 2 components (with means of approximately 0.44 and 0.85), and the best-fitting model for VFQ-UI had 3 components (with means of approximately 0.95, 0.74, and 0.90).

Conclusions

Models with multiple components better predict utility than those with single components. This article provides a valuable addition to the literature, in which previous mappings in visual acuity have been limited to linear regressions, resulting in unfounded assumptions about the distribution of the dependent variable.

Categories :
  • Clinical Outcomes
  • Economic Evaluation
  • Health Care Research
  • Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
  • Patient-Centered Research
  • Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
  • Trial-Based Economic Evaluation
Tags :
  • bolt-off
  • bolt-on
  • crosswalk
  • EQ-5D
  • EQ-5D vision
  • mapping
  • VFQ
  • VFQ-UI
  • visual acuity
Regions :
ViH Article Tags :