Head-to-Head Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of 3 Carer-Related Preference-Based Instruments [Editor's Choice]

Nov 1, 2020, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2020.07.005
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(20)32248-8/fulltext
Title : Head-to-Head Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of 3 Carer-Related Preference-Based Instruments [Editor's Choice]
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(20)32248-8&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2020.07.005
First page : 1477
Section Title : PREFERENCE-BASED ASSESSMENTS
Open access? : No
Section Order : 1477

Objectives

To compare the psychometric properties of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer), the Carer Experience Scale (CES), and the Care-related Quality of Life (CarerQol) to inform the choice of instrument in future studies.

Methods

Data were derived from a 2018 online survey of informal carers in Australia. Reliability was assessed via internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, α) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) for respondents who self-reported no change in their quality of life as a carer over 2 weeks. Convergent validity was evaluated via predetermined hypotheses about associations (Spearman’s rank correlation) with existing, validated measures. Discriminative validity was assessed based on the ability of the carer-related scores to distinguish between different informal care situations (Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance).

Results

Data from 500 carers were analyzed. The ASCOT-Carer demonstrated a higher degree of internal consistency, possibly due to a unidimensional structure, and test-retest reliability than the CarerQol and CES (α = 0.87, 0.65, 0.59; ICC, 0.87, 0.67, 0.81, respectively). All 3 instruments exhibited convergent validity and detected statistically significant associations between carer-related scores and different informal care situations, except for the CarerQol-7D and sole carer status.

Conclusions

The ASCOT-Carer, CarerQol, and CES performed reasonably well psychometrically; the ASCOT-Carer exhibited the best psychometric properties overall in this sample of Australian informal carers. Findings should be used in conjunction with consideration of research goals, carer population, targeted carer-related constructs, and prevailing perspectives on the economic evaluation to inform choice of instrument in future studies.

Categories :
  • Economic Evaluation
  • Patient-Centered Research
  • Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
  • Real World Data & Information Systems
  • Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction
  • Study Approaches
  • Surveys & Expert Panels
Tags :
  • carer-related quality of life
  • economic evaluation
  • informal care
  • outcome measurement
  • preference-based measures
Regions :
ViH Article Tags :