Selection of and Evidentiary Considerations for Wearable Devices and Their Measurements for Use in Regulatory Decision Making- Recommendations from the ePRO Consortium

Jun 1, 2018, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.012
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(17)33532-5/fulltext
Title : Selection of and Evidentiary Considerations for Wearable Devices and Their Measurements for Use in Regulatory Decision Making- Recommendations from the ePRO Consortium
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(17)33532-5&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.012
First page : 631
Section Title : COMPARITIVE-EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH/HTA
Open access? : Yes
Section Order : 1

Background

Wearable devices offer huge potential to collect rich sources of data to provide insights into the effects of treatment interventions. Despite this, at the time of writing this report, limited regulatory guidance on the use of wearables in clinical trial programs has been published.

Objectives

To present recommendations from the Critical Path Institute’s Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Consortium regarding the selection and evaluation of wearable devices and their measurements for use in regulatory trials and to support labeling claims.

Methods

The evaluation group was composed of Critical Path Institute’s clinical outcome assessment (COA) scientists and COA specialists from pharmaceutical trial eCOA solution providers, including COA development and validation specialists. The resulting recommendations were drawn from a broad range of backgrounds, perspectives, and expertise that enriched the development of this report. Recommendations were developed through analysis of existing regulatory guidance relating to COA development and use in clinical trials, medical device certification/clearance regulations, literature-reported best practice, and practical experience of wearable technology application in clinical trials.

Results

We identify the essential properties of fit-for-purpose wearables and propose evidence needed to support their use. In addition, we overview the activities required to establish clinical endpoints derived from wearables data.

Conclusions

Using this framework, we believe there is enough current understanding to promote the appropriate use of wearables in study protocols. We hope this will provide a basis for discussion among clinical trial stakeholders and catalyze the development of more robust regulatory guidance.

Categories :
Tags :
  • clinical outcomes
  • clinical trial endpoints
  • clinical trials
  • performance outcomes
  • remote monitoring
  • validation
  • wearables
Regions :
ViH Article Tags :