Societal Preferences for Funding Orphan Drugs in the United Kingdom- An Application of Person Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods

May 1, 2018, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.026
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(18)30194-3/fulltext
Title : Societal Preferences for Funding Orphan Drugs in the United Kingdom- An Application of Person Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(18)30194-3&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.026
First page : 538
Section Title : Articles
Open access? : No
Section Order : 7

Background

It is unclear whether UK National Health Service (NHS) policies for orphan drugs, which permit funding of non–cost-effective treatments, reflect societal preferences.

Methods

We conducted person trade-off (PTO) and discrete choice experiment (DCE) among 3950 adults selected to be representative of the UK general population. Experimental design was informed by surveys of patients affected by rare diseases, their caregivers, health care staff, and policymakers. Societal preferences were estimated in relation to treating a common disease, increases in waiting lists, or filling of vacant NHS posts. Results of the DCE were applied to recently licensed orphan drugs.

Results

On the basis of equal cost, the majority of respondents to the PTO (54%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 50–59) chose to allocate funds equally between patients treated for rare diseases and those treated for common diseases, with 32% (95% CI 28–36) favoring treating rare diseases over treating common diseases (14%; 95% CI 11–17), which this reduced to 23% (95% CI 20–27) when rare disease treatments were 10 times more expensive. When framed differently, more respondents prioritized not increasing waiting list size (43%; 95% CI 39–48) than to treat rare disease patients (34%; 95% CI 30–38).

Discussion

The DCE indicated a greater preference for treating a common disease over a rare disease. Respondents agreed with five of 12 positive appraisal recommendations for orphan drugs, even if their list price was higher, but preferred the NHS not to fund the remainder.

Conclusions

The general public does not value rarity as a sufficient reason to justify special consideration for additional NHS funding of orphan drugs. This has implications regarding the appropriateness of operating higher thresholds of cost-effectiveness.

Categories :
Tags :
  • discrete choice experiment
  • orphan drugs
  • person trade-off
  • rare disease
  • resource allocation
  • societal preferences
Regions :
ViH Article Tags :