Resolving the “Cost-Effective but Unaffordable” Paradox- Estimating the Health Opportunity Costs of Nonmarginal Budget Impacts

Mar 1, 2018, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.006
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(17)33613-6/fulltext
Title : Resolving the “Cost-Effective but Unaffordable” Paradox- Estimating the Health Opportunity Costs of Nonmarginal Budget Impacts
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(17)33613-6&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.006
First page : 266
Section Title : Articles
Open access? : No
Section Order : 3

Considering whether or not a proposed investment (an intervention, technology, or program of care) is affordable is really asking whether the benefits it offers are greater than its opportunity cost. To say that an investment is cost-effective but not affordable must mean that the (implicit or explicit) “threshold” used to judge cost-effectiveness does not reflect the scale and value of the opportunity costs. Existing empirical estimates of health opportunity costs are based on cross-sectional variation in expenditure and mortality outcomes by program budget categories (PBCs) and do not reflect the likely effect of nonmarginal budget impacts on health opportunity costs.

Categories :
Tags :
Regions :
ViH Article Tags :