Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Television Campaign to Promote Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Among the Elderly

Jul 1, 2015, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.1794
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(15)01960-9/fulltext
Title : Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Television Campaign to Promote Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Among the Elderly
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(15)01960-9&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.1794
First page : 622
Section Title : Economic Evaluation
Open access? : No
Section Order : 10

Background

The U.S. policy goals regarding influenza vaccination coverage rate among the elderly include the increase in the coverage rate and the elimination of disparities across racial/ethnic groups.

Objective

To examine the potential effectiveness of a television (TV) campaign to increase seasonal influenza vaccination among the elderly.

Methods

We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, defined as incremental cost per additionally vaccinated Medicare individual) of a hypothetical nationwide TV campaign for influenza vaccination compared with no campaign. We measured the effectiveness of the nationwide TV campaign (advertised once a week at prime time for 30 seconds) during a 17-week influenza vaccination season among four racial/ethnic elderly groups (N=39 million): non-Hispanic white (W), non-Hispanic African American (AA), English-speaking Hispanic (EH), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic (SH).

Results

The hypothetical campaign cost was $5,960,000 (in 2012 US dollars). The estimated campaign effectiveness ranged from −1.1% (the SH group) to 1.42% (the W group), leading to an increased disparity in influenza vaccination among non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic African American (W-AA) groups (0.6 percentage points), W-EH groups (0.1 percentage points), and W-SH groups (1.5 percentage points). The estimated ICER was $23.54 (95% confidence interval $14.21–$39.37) per additionally vaccinated Medicare elderly in a probabilistic analysis. Race/ethnicity-specific ICERs were lowest among the EH group ($22.27), followed by the W group ($22.47) and the AA group ($30.55). The nationwide TV campaign was concluded to be reasonably cost-effective compared with a benchmark intervention (with ICER $44.39 per vaccinated individual) of a school-located vaccination program. Break-even analyses estimated the maximum acceptable campaign cost to be $14,870,000, which was comparable to the benchmark ICER.

Conclusions

The results could justify public expenditures on the implementation of a future nationwide TV campaign, which should include multilingual campaigns, for promoting seasonal influenza vaccination.

Categories :
  • Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
  • Economic Evaluation
  • Infectious Disease
  • Respiratory-Related Disorders
  • Specialized Treatment Areas
  • Specific Diseases & Conditions
  • Vaccines
Tags :
  • cost-effectiveness
  • elderly population
  • influenza vaccination
  • television campaign
Regions :
  • North America
ViH Article Tags :