Questionnaire to Assess Relevance and Credibility of Modeling Studies for Informing Health Care Decision Making- An ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force Report

Mar 1, 2014, 00:00 AM
Section Title : ISPOR Task Force Reports
Section Order : 3
First Page : 174

The evaluation of the cost and health implications of agreeing to cover a new health technology is best accomplished using a model that mathematically combines inputs from various sources, together with assumptions about how these fit together and what might happen in reality. This need to make assumptions, the complexity of the resulting framework, the technical knowledge required, as well as funding by interested parties have led many decision makers to distrust the results of models. To assist stakeholders reviewing a model’s report, questions pertaining to the credibility of a model were developed. Because credibility is insufficient, questions regarding relevance of the model results were also created. The questions are formulated such that they are readily answered and they are supplemented by helper questions that provide additional detail. Some responses indicate strongly that a model should not be used for decision making: these trigger a “fatal flaw” indicator. It is hoped that the use of this questionnaire, along with the three others in the series, will help disseminate what to look for in comparative effectiveness evidence, improve practices by researchers supplying these data, and ultimately facilitate their use by health care decision makers.
HEOR Topics :
  • Administrative Claims (Insurance and Billing) Data
  • Clinical Trials
  • Decision Modeling & Simulation
  • Methodological & Statistical Research
  • Modeling and simulation
  • Patient-Centered Research
  • PRO & Related Methods
  • Prospective Observational Studies
  • Real World Data & Information Systems
  • Study Approaches
  • Surveys & Expert Panels
Tags :
  • credibility
  • good practices
  • modeling
  • quality assurance
  • validity
Regions :
  • Global