An Exploratory Study of Response Shift in Health-Related Quality of Life and Utility Assessment Among Patients with Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement Surgery in a Tertiary Hospital in Singapore

Jan 1, 2012, 00:00 AM
10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.011
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(11)03548-0/fulltext
Section Title : Patient-Reported Outcomes
Section Order : 18
First Page : S72

Objective

To investigate the influence of response shift (RS) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and utility assessment among patients undergoing total knee replacement.

Methods

Consenting patients undergoing total knee replacement were interviewed to determine their HRQOL by using the six-dimensional health state short form, derived from SF-36, and the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire at baseline (pretest 1) and the six-dimensional health state short form, derived from SF-36, at 6 (pretest 2) and 18 months after surgery (post-test). RS was studied by using a “then-test” approach by contacting participants 18 months after surgery and asking them to evaluate their HRQOL at baseline (then-test 1) and at 6 (then-test 2) and 18 months after surgery. RS was calculated as the score difference between pretest and then-test scores for a given time point. Relationships between RS and external variables were explored by using univariate and multiple liner regression analyses.

Results

In 74 subjects (63% response rate, median age 68 years), median (interquantile range) six-dimensional health state short form, derived from SF-36, scores for then-tests at baseline (0.48 [0.42–0.49]) and at 6 months (0.72 [0.66–0.79]) after surgery were significantly different from respective pretest scores (0.61 [0.58–0.68] at baseline, P = 0.000; 0.69 [0.63–0.72] at 6 months, P = 0.000), showing RS at both time points. RS at baseline (0.14 [0.08–0.20]) was significantly larger than that at 6 months (−0.05 [0.14 to 0.00], P = 0.000). EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire pretest and then-test scores at baseline also differed significantly (0.69 [0.17–0.73] vs. −0.18 [−0.23 to 0.00], P = 0.000). RS at baseline was not affected by assessed demographic or medical variables. RS at 6 months was greater in subjects with more years of education (16% of variance in multiple liner regression, P 0.01).

Conclusion

RS was present and impacted HRQOL and utility assessment among patients undergoing total knee replacement before and 6 months after surgery.

https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(11)03548-0&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.011
HEOR Topics :
  • Health State Utilities
  • Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Patient-Centered Research
  • Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
  • Specific Diseases & Conditions
Tags :
  • health-related quality of life
  • response shift
  • total knee replacement
  • utility assessment
Regions :
  • Asia Pacific (including Oceania)