Comparing Methods for Identifying Future High-Cost Mental Health Cases in Medicaid

Jan 1, 2012, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.007
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(11)01569-5/fulltext
Title : Comparing Methods for Identifying Future High-Cost Mental Health Cases in Medicaid
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(11)01569-5&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.007
First page : 198
Section Title : Health Policy Analysis
Open access? : No
Section Order : 14

Objective

This article examines methods for identifying future high-cost cases of Medicaid-covered mental health care services.

Methods

Florida Medicaid claims data are used to compare methods based on prior cost, and concurrent and prospective diagnosis-based models. Individuals with prior year expenditures in the top decile or with predicted expenditures in the top decile from the diagnosis-based models were expected to be high-cost individuals.

Results

Individuals in the top decile of prior year costs averaged $13,684 (US dollars) in costs in the following year with 50% remaining in the top decile of spending. Individuals classified as high cost by diagnosis-based models averaged $10,935 to $10,974, with 34% meeting the criteria for a high-cost case in the following year.

Conclusion

In contrast to research on high-costs cases for physical health care, prior cost was superior to diagnosis-based models at identifying future high cases for mental health care.

Categories :
  • Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
  • Economic Evaluation
  • Health Policy & Regulatory
  • Insurance Systems & National Health Care
  • Mental Health
  • Specific Diseases & Conditions
Tags :
  • diagnosis-based models
  • high-cost users
  • Medicaid
Regions :
  • North America
ViH Article Tags :