Patrones de Tratamiento y Costo de Atención del Cáncer de Mama Avanzado Con Falla a Antraciclinas y Taxanos en 3 Hospitales Públicos de México

Jul 1, 2011, 00:00
10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.029
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(11)01445-8/fulltext
Title : Patrones de Tratamiento y Costo de Atención del Cáncer de Mama Avanzado Con Falla a Antraciclinas y Taxanos en 3 Hospitales Públicos de México
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(11)01445-8&doi=10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.029
First page : S147
Section Title : Health Outcomes Analysis
Open access? : No
Section Order : 12

Objectives

In Mexico, breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality among females. For patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes (AT), there are limited treatment options. There is a scarcity of data regarding clinical management of this population and treatment costs at this stage of the disease. The objective of this study was to describe the treatment patterns of care for metastatic breast cancer after AT and the associated cost from the point-of-view of the Mexican Public Health Care Sector.

Methods

Between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2007, a retrospective cohort of adult female ABC patients resistant to AT was developed by reviewing and extracting key data from medical charts. We conducted a retrospective, transversal and descriptive analysis of the patient data. Target population data files were obtained from 414 patients from 3 public hospitals in México.

Results

Capecitabine, vinorelbine and cyclophosfamide were the most commonly prescribed agents, however clinical drug therapy management of the disease was different within and among the three hospitals included in the study. This difference translated into a disparity of prescription costs, ranging from an average of $122.22 pesos/patient/month (cyclophosfamide, IC 95% $94.43-$150.01) to $37,835.53 pesos/patient/month (capecitabine+trastuzumab IC 95% $34,953.18-$40,717.88) for the first treatment after AT.

Conclusions

The results highlight a lack of standardized care for patients and suggest that differences in treatment patterns are not only a reflection of scarcity of scientific data and diversity of prescription preferences among physicians but also of economic restrictions. Ultimately, there is a clear unmet medical need to be addressed through evidence-based medicine alternatives that support efficacy and cost effectiveness treatments.

Categories :
  • Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
  • Oncology
  • Retrospective Databases: Electronic Medical and Health Records, Admin Claims
  • Specific Diseases & Conditions
  • Study Approaches
  • Treatment Patterns and Guidelines
Tags :
  • breast cancer
  • costs
  • health care utilization
  • treatment patterns
Regions :
  • Latin America
ViH Article Tags :