Cost-Effectiveness of Switching to Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 from Human Insulin in Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes in South Korea

Nov 1, 2009, 00:00 AM
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00628.x
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(10)60341-5/fulltext
Section Title :
Section Order : 8
First Page :

Objectives

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of switching patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus from human insulin (HI) to biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in South Korea.

Methods

A published and validated diabetes computer simulation model (the IMS CORE Diabetes Model) was used to evaluate the long-term clinical and economic outcomes associated with switching to BIAsp 30, using treatment effects from the South Korean subgroup of the Physician's Routine Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of NovoMix® 30 Therapy study and cost data collected through primary research. Outcomes included life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, incidence of complications, direct medical costs, and cost-effectiveness. Analyses were performed from a third-party payer perspective over a 30-year time horizon. Future costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 5% per annum. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results

Switching patients uncontrolled on HI to BIAsp 30 was projected to increase discounted mean life expectancy by 0.15 ± 0.18 years per patient (8.62 ± 0.13 years vs. 8.47 ± 0.13 years) and improve discounted mean quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.30 ± 0.12 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient (5.68 ± 0.09 QALYs vs. 5.38 ± 0.09 QALYs). Conversion to BIAsp 30 was associated with a mean increase in direct costs of South Korean Won (KRW) 1,777,323 ± 359,209 over patient lifetimes. BIAsp 30 was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of KRW5,916,758 per QALY gained versus HI.

Conclusion

Switching patients uncontrolled on HI to BIAsp 30 was projected to improve life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy. This analysis suggests that BIAsp 30 could be a cost-effective treatment option in type 2 diabetes patients poorly controlled on HI in South Korea.

https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(10)60341-5&doi=10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00628.x
HEOR Topics :
  • Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
  • Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
  • Decision Modeling & Simulation
  • Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders
  • Specific Diseases & Conditions
  • Study Approaches
Tags :
  • biphasic insulin aspart 30
  • cost-effectiveness
  • modeling
  • South Korea
  • type 2 diabetes
Regions :
  • Asia Pacific (including Oceania)