Ultrasound-Guided Central Line Placement as Compared with Standard Landmark Technique- Some Unpleasant Arithmetic for the Economics of Medical Innovation

Jan 1, 2009, 00:00
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00427.x
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(10)60679-1/fulltext
Title : Ultrasound-Guided Central Line Placement as Compared with Standard Landmark Technique- Some Unpleasant Arithmetic for the Economics of Medical Innovation
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(10)60679-1&doi=10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00427.x
First page :
Section Title :
Open access? : No
Section Order : 28

Objective

We perform a simple cost estimation of ultrasound guidance for the placement of central venous access, considering the US federal reimbursement for ultrasound guidance of central line placement to the federal reimbursement for treating the complication of pneumothorax.

Methods

We utilize national statistics on the number of central lines placed annually to determine the cost savings incurred if all central lines placed in the United States were placed with ultrasound guidance.

Results

The initial “cost” of placing central lines was found to be 390,780,000 to 651,300,000 dollars per year by the landmark technique, as compared with 494,820,000 to 824,700,000 dollars per year by ultrasound guidance.

Conclusions

The cost of ultrasound guidance was not mitigated by its reduction in the cost of treating pneumothoraces.

Categories :
  • Cardiovascular Disorders
  • Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
  • Diagnostics & Imaging
  • Economic Evaluation
  • Medical Technologies
  • Specific Diseases & Conditions
Tags :
  • cardiovascular disease prevention
  • clinical research
  • cost analysis
  • cost savings
Regions :
  • Global
ViH Article Tags :