What Is Sufficient Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures?

Nov 1, 2007, 00:00
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00272.x
https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(10)60634-1/fulltext
Title : What Is Sufficient Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures?
Citation : https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/action/showCitFormats?pii=S1098-3015(10)60634-1&doi=10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00272.x
First page :
Section Title :
Open access? : No
Section Order : 11

Abstract

This article focuses on the necessary psychometric properties of a patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measure. Topics include the importance of reliability and validity, psychometric approaches used to provide reliability and validity estimates, the kinds of evidence needed to indicate that a PRO has a sufficient level of reliability and validity, contexts that may affect psychometric properties, methods available to evaluate PRO instruments when the context varies, and types of reliability and validity testing that are appropriate during different phases of clinical trials.

Categories :
  • Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation
  • Patient-Centered Research
  • Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Tags :
  • patient-reported outcomes
  • psychometric
  • validation
Regions :
  • Global
ViH Article Tags :