ISPOR 16th Annual International Meeting: SHORT COURSES - SUNDAY MAY 22, 2011
 

SHORT COURSES - SUNDAY, MAY 22, 2011
Short Course Program Overview Short Courses Saturday, May 21 Short Courses Sunday, May 22

SUNDAY, MAY 22, 2011 (All Day Courses)
8:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Modeling Methods

Discrete Event Simulation for Economic Analyses
Room: Holiday Ballroom 1 (2nd Floor)
Faculty: J. Jaime Caro MDCM, FRCPC, FACP, Adjunct Professor of Medicine, Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal PQ & Senior Vice-President of Health Economics, United BioSource Corporation, Lexington, MA, USA; Jörgen Möller MSc Mech Eng, Vice President, Modeling, United BioSource Corporation, Eslov, Sweden
Course Description: This course will provide a basic understanding of the key concepts of discrete event simulation. The focus will be on the use of these simulation models to address pharmacoeconomic (and device-related) problems. The course will be structured around practical exercises. Topics to be covered are: Why DES? Dynamic simulation as a tool; Components of a DES; How do you build a model? Modeling of processes and resource use; Modeling of variables and decisions. Simple animation will be demonstrated. We will use ARENA to build simple models. Instructors will distribute training versions of Arena. Participants who wish to have hands-on experience must bring their personal laptops. 
Level: Intermediate.  This course is designed for those with some experience with modeling.
*Prerequisite: Attendance at the course, “Modeling: Design and Structure of a Model”, or equivalent knowledge is recommended.
J. Jaime Caro MDCM, FRCPC, FACP Jörgen Möller MSc Mech Eng
J. J. Caro
J. Möller

SUNDAY, MAY 22, 2011 (Morning Courses)
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM

Modeling Methods
Bayesian Analysis - Advanced
Room: Holiday Ballroom 2 (2nd Floor)
Faculty: David J. Vanness PhD, Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA and Visiting Scientist, Health Economics and Science Policy, United BioSource Corporation, Bethesda, MD, USA
Course Description:  This course introduces the use of Bayesian methods in evidence synthesis (including meta-analysis) and allows participants to gain hands-on experience using such modeling techniques within WinBUGS. Methodological issues considered in the course include: fixed & random effects models, choice of prior distributions, subgroups, meta-regression and adjusting for baseline risk, together with indirect and mixed treatment comparisons. Further meta-analysis topics for which a Bayesian approach can be of benefit will also be highlighted.
Participants will be expected to be familiar with the use of WinBUGS and will be responsible for bringing a laptop with the latest, unrestricted version of WinBUGS pre-installed [Details at www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs ].
Level: Advanced.
*Prerequisite: This course is a follow-up to the course “Bayesian Analysis – Overview and Applications”. Basic knowledge of the Bayesian approach and use of WinBUGS (equivalent to attendance at the Overview & Applications short course) will be assumed.
David J. Vanness PhD
D. J. Vanness

Data Methods

Applications in Using Large Databases
Room: Peale AB (1st Floor)
Faculty: Diana Brixner PhD, RPh, Professor and Executive Director, University of Utah, College of Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Michael Eaddy PhD, PharmD, Vice President, Xcenda, Palm Harbor, FL, USA; John Parkinson PhD, Head of GPRD, London, UK
Course Description: This course will provide a review of three health care databases – GPRD (UK database), GE Centricity electronic medical record (USA database) and Medicare (USA database).  Each database will be discussed in-depth including directions on how to access the information and how researchers utilize this information.  Instructors will distinguish the important differences between these databases including the limitations and strategies to maximize their value through the use of an interactive format with interactive examples, The ISPOR International Digest of Databases and its use in identifying health care databases around the globe will be briefly discussed.  
Level: Intermediate.  Participants must have some knowledge of administrative health care database analysis.
*Prerequisite: The short course “Introduction to Design and Analysis of Comparative Effectiveness Studies Using Retrospective Databases” is a prerequisite for this course.
 Diana Brixner PhD, RPh Michael Eaddy PhD, PharmD
D. Brixner
M. Eaddy
John Parkinson PhD  
J. Parkinson
Patient Reported Outcomes / Preference-based Methods

Conjoint Analysis - Theory & Methods
Room: Holiday Ballroom 4 (2nd Floor)

Faculty: A. Brett Hauber PhD, Global Head, Health Preference Assessment & Market Access, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; John F. P. Bridges PhD, Assistant Professor, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Course Description: Course participants will learn the conceptual and empirical basis for using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences in outcomes research.  The course will introduce participants to both the conceptual basis for quantifying decision-maker preferences for medical interventions and the practical design and analytical issues that must be addressed in order to obtain valid empirical preference estimates.  The course will be structured following the good research practice guidelines and discussion being prepared by the ISPOR Good Research Practices for the Application of Conjoint Analysis in Health Task Force. The course will include lectures and interactive group exercises and group discussion. 
Level: Intermediate.  This course is designed for clinicians, policy makers, researchers, and patient advocates/researchers with little or no knowledge of conjoint analysis or other stated-preference methods.

A. Brett Hauber PhD John F. P. Bridges PhD
A. B. Hauber
J. F. P. Bridges

Patient-Reported Outcomes – Item Response Theory
Room: Latrobe (1st Floor)
Faculty: Bryce Reeve PhD, Associate Professor, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center & Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Course Description: There is a great need in health outcomes research to develop instruments that accurately measure a person's health status with minimal response burden. This need for psychometrically sound and clinically meaningful measures calls for better analytical tools beyond the methods available from traditional measurement theory. Applications of item response theory (IRT) modeling have increased considerably because of its utility for instrument development and evaluation, assessment of measurement equivalence, instrument linking, and computerized adaptive testing. IRT models the relationship, in probabilistic terms, between a person's response to a survey question and their standing on a health construct such as fatigue or depression. This information allows instrument developers to develop reliable and efficient quality of life measures tailored for an individual or group. This introductory workshop will discuss the basics of IRT models and applications of these models to improve health outcomes measurement. Illustrations will be used throughout the presentation that focus on measuring key health-related quality of life domains in different disease populations.  The NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) project will also be discussed for its relevance for assessing patient-reported outcomes using modern psychometric methods.
Level: Introductory. This course is designed for those with little to no experience with IRT.
Bryce Reeve PhD
B. Reeve


Utility Measures
Room: Ruth (1st Floor)
Faculty: Andrew Lloyd DPhil, Director, Oxford Outcomes, Oxford, UK; Sarah Acaster MSc, Senior Outcomes Researcher, Oxford Outcomes, Oxford, UK
Course Description: This course is designed to provide an introduction and overview of utility measures to support economic evaluations.  The concepts of health-related quality of life and utility will be introduced and discussed in terms of their differences and similarities.  We will describe how these data can be combined with survival to estimate quality-adjusted life years.  Some issues for debate will be introduced.  In the second section we will explore the methods that are used to capture utilities such as standard gamble, time trade off and rating scales.  Building on this will be a presentation of the different generic instruments that have been developed for measuring quality of life such as the EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index and SF-36.  Estimating utilities from a condition-specific measure will also be discussed.  In the third section we will describe approaches that can be used when utility data from trials are not available.  The development of mapping functions and other crosswalks will be described from disease-specific measures to generic HRQL measures.  The pros and cons of the different main approaches will be discussed.  Other approaches to addressing a lack of utility data will also be described including prospective observational studies, systematic reviews, critical appraisal of published values and the valuation of vignette type descriptions of health.  In the final section we will describe the requirements and preferences of different reimbursement agencies around the world including UK/ Australia/ Canada; US agencies; EU markets such as Sweden/ Belgium/ Netherlands/ Germany; Asia and Latin America.  The course will be interactive with break-out sessions and group discussion. 
Level: Introductory. No prior knowledge of utilities or health-related quality of life is assumed. 
Andrew Lloyd DPhil Sarah Acaster MSc
A. Lloyd
S. Acaster

Use of Pharmacoeconomics / Economic / Outcomes Research Information

Case Studies in Pharmaceutical/Biotech Pricing II – Advanced
Room: Holiday Ballroom 3 (2nd Floor)
Faculty: Jack M. Mycka, Global President & CEO, MME LLC, Montclair, NJ, USA; Renato Dellamano PhD, President, MME Europe & ValueVector (Value Added Business Strategies), Milan, Italy
Course Description: Case studies will be employed to lead participants through the key steps of new product pricing, with focus on the need to thoroughly analyze the business environment and its constraints and opportunities, and the need to closely integrate the pricing, reimbursement and pharmacoeconomic strategy for the new product with the clinical development and marketing strategies. Practical exercises will allow participants to consolidate the concepts delivered in the “Elements” introductory session and expanded here. Areas covered will include the post-launch issues of reimbursement and pricing maintenance as a part of life-cycle management in a global environment.
Level: Advanced
*Prerequisite: This course is for individuals who have completed the short course “Elements of Pharmaceutical / Biotech Pricing I – Introduction” or are familiar with both the key determinants of pharmaceutical pricing and the main international health systems. 
Jack M. Mycka Renato Dellamano PhD
J. M. Mycka
R. Dellamano

Pharmacoeconomic / Economic Methods

Statistical Considerations in Health Economic Evaluations
Room: Holiday Ballroom 5 (2nd Floor)

Faculty: Henry Glick PhD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Jalpa A. Doshi PhD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, General Internal Medicine; Director, Economic Evaluations Unit, Center for Evidence-Based Practice; Director, Value-Based Insurance Design Initiatives, Center for Health Incentives, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Course Description: Adoption and diffusion of new medical treatments depend increasingly on robust analysis of costs and cost-effectiveness. During this course, we discuss design issues for the collection of primary economic data as well as statistical considerations, including the effect of distributional assumptions, univariate and multivariable analyses of data, sample size and power calculations, and estimation of sampling uncertainty for cost-effectiveness analysis. Examples will be provided to illustrate concepts. 
Level: Intermediate. Participants should have basic knowledge of economic evaluations and statistics.

Henry Glick PhD Jalpa A. Doshi PhD
H. Glick
J. A. Doshi

SUNDAY, MAY 22, 2011 (Afternoon Courses)
1:00 PM - 5:00 PM

Pharmacoeconomic / Economic Methods

Applications of Statistical Considerations in Health Economic Evaluations
Room: Holiday Ballroom 3 (2nd Floor)
Faculty: Henry Glick PhD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Jalpa A. Doshi PhD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, General Internal Medicine; Director, Economic Evaluations Unit, Center for Evidence-Based Practice; Director, Value-Based Insurance Design Initiatives, Center for Health Incentives, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Course Description: This course will provide applications of statistical considerations in economic analysis. Specific exercises will be conducted to illustrate univariate & multivariable analysis of costs (including the effect of distributional assumptions), sample size and power calculations for cost-effectiveness analysis, and estimation of confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios and net monetary benefits as well as acceptability curves.  Participants who wish to have hands-on experience must bring their laptops. Statistical analysis will be done by use of STATA.  A trial version of the software will be distributed for those who do not have the software. The text “Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials” (Oxford: OUP, 2007) is recommended reading for this course.
Level: Advanced
*Prerequisite: Previous attendance at the ISPOR short course, “Statistical Considerations in Economic Evaluations”, is required.
Henry Glick PhD Jalpa A. Doshi PhD
H. Glick
J. A. Doshi

Use of Pharmacoeconomics / Economic / Outcomes Research Information

Risk-Sharing/Performance-Based Arrangements for Drugs and Other Medical Products
Room: Holiday Ballroom 2 (2nd Floor)
Faculty: Lou Garrison PhD, Professor, Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research & Policy Program, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Adrian Towse MA, MPhil, Director, Office of Health Economics, London, UK; Josh Carlson PhD, Research Assistant Professor, Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research & Policy Program, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Course Description: There is significant and growing interest among both the payers and producers of medical products for arrangements that involve a “pay-for-performance” or “risk-sharing” element. These payment schemes involve a plan by which the performance of the product is tracked in a defined patient population over a specified period of time and the level of reimbursement is tied by formula to the outcomes achieved.  Although these agreements have an intrinsic appeal, there can be substantial barriers to their implementation.  The theory and practice, including incentives and barriers, will be analyzed along with several examples of performance-based schemes from Europe, the United States, and Australia.  A hypothetical case study will be used in an interactive session to illustrate a systematic approach to weighing their applicability and feasibility. 
Level: Intermediate
*Prerequisite: It would be helpful for individuals taking this course to have completed the short course “Elements of Pharmaceutical/Biotech Pricing I – Introduction” or to be familiar with both the key determinants of pharmaceutical pricing and the main international health systems.
Lou Garrison PhD Adrian Towse MA, MPhil
L. Garrison
A. Towse
Josh Carlson PhD  
J. Carlson

Outcomes Research Methods

Outcomes Research for Medical Devices and Diagnostics
Room: Holiday Ballroom 5 (2nd Floor)
Faculty: Stacey Ackerman MSE, PhD, Vice President, Covance Market Access Services, San Diego, CA, USA; Seema Sonnad PhD, Associate Professor & Director, Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA;
Course Description: This course will present outcomes research practices that are specifically tailored for the fast-paced medical device and diagnostics technology environment and address issues related to these health technology assessment methodologies. Outcomes research including clinical outcomes, economic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes will be discussed. Outcomes research for medical devices and diagnostics will be differentiated from other health care interventions such as drugs. The evidence hierarchy for medical devices and diagnostic procedures including “real world” outcomes research information in coverage and reimbursement decisions will be discussed.
Level: Introductory. This course is designed for those with little experience with outcomes research for medical device and diagnostic technologies.
Stacey Ackerman MSE, PhD Seema Sonnad PhD
S. Ackerman
S. Sonnad

Data Methods

Propensity Scores and Observational Studies of Treatment Effect
Room: Holiday Ballroom 4 (2nd Floor)

Faculty: John Seeger PharmD, DrPH, Instructor in Medicine, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Harvard Medical School/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Course Description: A large part of the evidence about the effectiveness of different treatments is based on observational research. Issues of bias and confounding relate to study design and analysis in the setting of non-random treatment assignment where compared subjects might differ substantially with respect to comorbidities. This course will outline the key concerns in the conduct of observational research of treatment effect and explain methods for causal inference in observational settings.  No control over the treatment assignment and the lack of balance in the covariates between the treatment and control groups can produce confounded estimates of treatment effect. We will explain how propensity scores can be used to mitigate confounding, through standard observational approaches (restriction, stratification, matching, regression, or weighting). The advantages and disadvantages of standard adjustment relative to propensity score-based methods will be discussed.  Details of propensity score methodology (variable selection, use, and diagnostics) will also be discussed. The course will also elaborate briefly on risk adjustment models that collapse predictors of outcomes (disease risk scores such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Chronic Disease Scores) and their use relative to propensity scores.
Level: Intermediate. This course is designed for those with little experience with this methodology but some knowledge of observational databases.
*Prerequisite: The short course “Introduction to Design and Analysis of Comparative Effectiveness Studies Using Retrospective Databases” is a prerequisite for this course.

John Seeger PharmD, DrPH
John Seeger

Patient Reported Outcomes / Preference-based Methods

Advanced Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment - Psychometric Methods
Room: Ruth (1st. Floor)
Faculty: Bruce Crawford MPH, MA, General Manager, Asia, Mapi Values, Tokyo, Japan; Stacie Hudgens MA (AbD), Director, Psychometrics and Statistics, Mapi Values, Boston, MA, USA
Course Description: This course will discuss psychometric analysis and the application of various techniques such as structural equation modeling (SEM), factor analysis (FA) and item response theory (IRT) in testing patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments, measures and construct / criterion validity.  Validity indicates how well a measurement tool allows us to infer something about the true nature and value of the object or system being considered.  Instructors will explain and demonstrate how to analyze observed and latent constructs and variables within a model as well as to test the validity of a PRO measure.  Specific examples will be given to highlight how researchers can apply these techniques to test methods, criteria and new measures. 
Level: Advanced. This course is designed for those with a working knowledge of QoL/PRO methods.
*Prerequisite: Attendance at the short course “Introduction to Patient-Reported Outcomes” or equivalent knowledge is required.
Bruce Crawford MPH, MA Stacie Hudgens MA
B. Crawford
S. Hudgens


Establishing the Content Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Instruments
Room: Latrobe (1st Floor)
Faculty: Donald L. Patrick PhD, MSPH, Professor, University of Washington, Seattle Quality of Life, Seattle, WA, USA; Mona L. Martin RN, MPA, Executive Director, Health Research Associates, Inc, Seattle, WA, USA; Chad Gwaltney PhD, Senior Scientist, PRO Consulting, Pittsburgh, PA, USA & Assistant Professor (Research), Department of Community Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
Course Description: This course will focus on establishing the content validity of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments intended for use as the basis for medical product claims in the US and Europe, according to the FDA Guidance for Industry – Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims and the EMA Reflection Paper on the Regulatory Guidance on the Use of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Measures in the Evaluation of Medicinal Products.   After this course, participants will be able to: 1) define eight essential requirements for establishing content validity of existing and new PRO instruments; 2) gather evidence to meet these requirements and 3) document the evidence in applications for regulatory approval of desired medical product claims.  Examples will be given throughout on each evidence requirement. Participants will take part in several practical exercises that are part of the iterative process for determining and establishing evidence of content validity for PRO instruments.  Faculty will also reference The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modifications PRO Task Force Report
Level: Advanced. This course assumes attendees have a basic understanding of qualitative interviewing methods and measurement properties of PRO instruments.
Donald L. Patrick PhD, MSPH Mona L. Martin RN, MPA
D. L. Patrick
M. L. Martin
Chad Gwaltney PhD  
C. Gwaltney

Modeling Methods

Advanced Decision Modeling for Health Economic Evaluations
Room: Peale AB (1st Floor)
Faculty: Andrew Briggs PhD, Lindsay Chair in Health Policy & Economic Evaluation, Public Health & Health Policy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Mark Sculpher PhD, MSc, Professor, University of York, Centre for Health Economics, Heslington York, UK
Course Description: During this course, the key aspects and new developments of decision modeling for economic analysis will be considered. How models can be made probabilistic to capture parameter uncertainty (including rationale, choosing parameter distributions, and types of uncertainty) will be covered. How to analyze and present the results of probabilistic models will be presented. How the results of probabilistic decision modeling should be interpreted and how decisions should be made (including decisions with uncertainty, and expected value of perfect information [EVPI]), will be presented. Specific examples including Excel programming will be used to illustrate concepts.
Level: Advanced. Participants should have an understanding of decision analysis.
*Prerequisite: Attendance at the course, “Modeling: Design and Structure of a Model”, or equivalent knowledge is strongly recommended.
Andrew Briggs PhD Mark Sculpher PhD, MSc
A. Briggs
M. Sculpher