A PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION FOR DIABETES TYPE 2 (DM 2) WITH INHIBITORS OF DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE-4 (DPP-4) AND THIAZOLIDINEDIONES (TZD) IN MONOTHERAPY

Author(s)

Jos Manuel Celaya, MD, Medical Advisor Cardiovascular & Metabolism1, F. Fon, MD, Medical Advisor1, Clotilde Ayala, MSc, Researcher2, Oscar Antunez, MSc, Medical adviser3, Fernando Garcia-Contreras, MSc, MD41Novartis, Mexico City, Mexico; 2 Epieconomics Research, Mexico City, DF, Mexico; 3 Novartis, Mexico, DF, Mexico; 4 Mexican Institute of Social Security, México, Distrito Federal, Mexico

OBJECTIVES: The inhibitors of the DPP-4 has been shown to enhance the physiological effects of incretin hormones such as glucagone-like peptide and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide thereby increasing ƒÑ-cells and £]-cells sensitivity to glucose. The objective of the study is comparing the cost-effectiveness ratios, between vildagliptin 100mg, sitagliptin 100 mg, rosiglitazone 8mg and pioglitazone 30mg. METHODS: A meta-analysis of published rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, sitagliptin and vildagliptin trials were performed the effectiveness were obtained by means of a fit put-analysis according to the basal one of HbA1c of 9%. A decision analytic model with a decision tree with Bayesian approach was developed. Cost-effectiveness analysis was made. Resources utilization included emergency room patients, outpatients and hospital inpatients services, drugs, etc. Data were obtained from hospital records. The information was validated by an expert panel. The unit costs were gotten from the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS). The perspective was from IMSS. Analysis was conducted on a 12 month period and discounting rate was not used. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental net benefits were obtained. One-way, two-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed and acceptability curves were constructed. RESULTS: The lower expected cost was with vildagliptin US$9176, while higher expected cost was with pioglitazone US$12,002, the lowest cost per succesfull unit was the one based on vildagliptin US$8,342, while the highest was the one based on sitagliptin US $16,718. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) analyses show that vildagliptin was a dominant alternative over sitagliptin, pioglitazone and rosiglitazone. The incremental net benefits were higher for vildaglitin strategy in independent way to willingness to pay. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Vildagliptin 100mg dominant is the dominant alternative as monotherapy over sitagliptin, rosiglitazone y pioglitazone in type 2 diabetic patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2007-10, ISPOR Europe 2007, Dublin, Ireland

Value in Health, Vol. 10, No. 6 (November/December 2007)

Code

PDB4

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×