BODY MASS INDEX, HBA1C CONTROL, AND HEALTHCARE EXPENDITURES AMONG PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES- AN ANALYSIS OF ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS LINKED TO ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS

Author(s)

Johnston SS1, Hsiao C2, Goldstein LJ3, Daskiran M4, Scamuffa R5
1Johnson & Johnson Co., New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2Global Health Economics and Market Access, Ethicon Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA, 3Johnson & Johnson, Markham, ON, Canada, 4Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 5Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, Cincinnati, OH, USA

OBJECTIVES:  To examine the association between body mass index (BMI) categories, poor hemoglobin A1c control (HbA1c≥7%), and healthcare expenditures among US patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and BMI classified as overweight or greater (BMI ≥25). METHODS:  Retrospective, observational study using U.S. electronic medical records linked to administrative claims data (Optum’s Integrated Claims-Clinical data). Patients selected for study were aged≥18, had a recorded BMI between 25-80 during 2014, were continuously enrolled in health insurance for 6 months before and after the last BMI measurement (12-month evaluation period) in 2014, and had ≥1 medical claim T2DM diagnosis and ≥1 antihyperglycemic prescription claim within the evaluation period. Patients were classified into BMI categories using the last recorded BMI in 2014: 25-29.9 (overweight); 30-34.9 (obese/class-I [OCI]); 35-39.9 (obese/class-II [OCII]); ≥40 (obese/class-III [OCIII]). Multivariable regressions adjusting for patient demographics were used to examine the associations between poor HbA1c control, BMI category, and separate outcomes of total healthcare expenditures and pharmacy expenditures measured during the evaluation period. RESULTS:  A total of 27,117 patients were included for study (mean age=64; 52% female): Compared to patients with HbA1c<7%, those with HbA1c≥7% had 8% higher total healthcare expenditures (Cost Ratio [CR]=1.08, P=0.002, adjusted=$22,477 vs. $20,837) and 23% higher pharmacy expenditures (CR=1.23, P<0.001, adjusted=$5,297 vs. $4,297). Compared with overweight patients: OCI patients did not have significantly higher total healthcare or pharmacy expenditures; OCII patients did not have significantly higher total healthcare expenditures but did have 17% higher pharmacy expenditures (CR=1.17, P<0.001, adjusted=$5,287 vs. $4,527); OCIII patients had 13% higher total healthcare expenditures (CR=1.13, P=0.001, adjusted=$24,206 vs. $21,433) and 30% higher pharmacy expenditures (CR=1.30, P<0.001, adjusted=$5,895 vs. $4,527). CONCLUSIONS:  Among patients with T2DM who are overweight or obese, poor HbA1c control and high levels of obesity are associated with higher total healthcare expenditures and pharmacy expenditures.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-05, ISPOR 2017, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 5 (May 2017)

Code

PSY6

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×