FROM EVALUATION TO OPTIMIZATION- USING A META-MODEL TO MAXIMIZE THE BENEFITS OF COLORECTAL SCREENING ACCOUNTING FOR CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS

Author(s)

Koffijberg H1, Coupe VM2, IJzerman MJ1, Greuter MJ2
1University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

OBJECTIVES:

Model-based analyses are typically useful for assessing the cost-effectiveness of a few but not a vast number of alternative health care strategies. We aim to illustrate the potential advantages of using a meta-model to identify the best screening strategy for colorectal cancer accounting for colonoscopy capacity constraints.

METHODS:

We defined screening strategies by starting age, interval, number of screening rounds, and screening test positivity threshold (16,464 unique strategies). We evaluated a limited sample of predefined strategies with the validated ASCCA model and identified the best screening strategy therein, in terms of life-years gained (LYG), compared with no screening. Next, this limited sample was used to fit a Gaussian Process meta-model. Finally, discrete evolutionary programming was used to iteratively identify the best possible screening strategy according to the meta-model (GP-DEP approach). Colonoscopy demand was restricted to 500 per 1,000 simulated individuals. The sample size of predefined strategies was varied (n=50-200). GP-DEP performance was assessed with bootstrapping (n=200), brute force exhaustive search, and comparison with ASCCA outcomes.

RESULTS:

GP-DEP resulted in stable predicted best screening strategies when applied to a sample of >=100 strategies, identifying the exact same best strategy as exhaustive search in 94% of bootstrap samples. Compared with ASCCA, predicted colonoscopy demand, LYG and costs of the best strategies from GP-DEP were accurate, slightly too high and slightly too low, respectively. However, strategy ranking (in deciles) according to ASCCA and GP-DEP were similar. For sample size 100, average predicted benefit of the best strategy identified by GP-DEP compared to the best strategy identified by ASCCA equalled 0.028 LYG (95%CI 0.013-0.043) per individual.

CONCLUSIONS:

Extending the ASCCA model with GP-DEP enhances performance: the best screening strategy can be identified much faster, even when constraints apply, and will outperform the best screening strategy as typically identified from a limited sample of predefined strategies.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PRM146

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Confounding, Selection Bias Correction, Causal Inference, Modeling and simulation

Disease

Multiple Diseases, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×